Profile of Maret

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 711

General Information


Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 30 May 2017, 18:40 PM Please give to is-2 normal ability that good fit to role of heavy tank. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Dushkas Overperforming30 May 2017, 13:43 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 13:40 PMRiCE I don't know how DSHK was before the latest patch, but right now they almost instapin infantry. Nothing changes, only maxim was nerfed. DSHK have OLD design from very beginning of game. Who need dushka when you have good stock HMG? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T 34 a much better tank than P430 May 2017, 13:05 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 13:00 PMGarrett The T34-76 is pretty good tho, I would argue its the best tank when you look at price-effectiveness ratio. The P4 on the otherhand is very underwhelming, or at least inconsistent as hell... I think it will be good, if p4 have smoke screen as standart option. P4 good vs stock soviet armor (almost everything will be penetrated from every distance), it's bad against t34-85 and heavies. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T 34 a much better tank than P430 May 2017, 12:55 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 12:51 PMdartag01 Please Guys all this is very interesting, still, bare with me here... My problem is that in game, especially mid game, the russian have no equivalent to P4. while everybody does have its own: sherman and cromwell are well priced and can performed... not the T34 76... that was my idea from the start. Double su-76 (even 1 with infantry protection) give your best AT option until panther or tiger arrive (but with Mark target and micro you can kill them too). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T 34 a much better tank than P430 May 2017, 12:25 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 12:03 PMdartag01 I know for sure they could not stop the engines during the coldest winter or had to make fire under the tank to start them back the following day... I did not know T 34 had problems... It was problem for each army (not from good life, t34 crew started fire under tank). USF had little troubles with that because Sherman has heater (small engine for heating) to warm engine. It was popular to warm inside tank when you are waiting on position. Because start of main engine to heat yourself was...costly and resource of engine decreased. Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 12:03 PMdartag01 Still It does not answer the question: Why the Zis 3 76mm canon of the T 34 is so shitty in the game... It was a balance question aiming to stick the reality of the machine, not an historical question.... It was not zis-3 gun, only su-76 had zis-3 gun. T34 gun was F34 (best to 1941, but bad to 1943). Jump back to quoted post30 May 2017, 12:03 PMdartag01 I just wanted to point 2 things : Russian have no Mobile turret tanks able to down a large tank. and the SU 85 or ISU 152 are very low compared to Jag and Elephant... This is where the trouble stand for me... The fact that russian have no mobile anti tank option in the game while they had amazing sturdy tanks... ok no Radio, bad optic. Give it a low accuracy (it has it already) a poor fiel of view (it has it already). But it has a wonderfull canon. give it the punch it deserve especially because russian have no such thing in their arsenal..... Soviet has t34-85 as mobile tank destroyer (500 meters and you can kill tiger on front). Su-100 is close equivalent to Elephant, it was pure tank destroyer. Radio (thanks to lend lease, soviets could make their copy of british tank radio for tanks), good optics, good shells (thanks to lend lease gun powder) all it has t34-85. Isu-152,122 and Is-2 they all for breakthrough germans defense and crushing bunkers, fighting against tanks not was their main role (but they have opportunites to that). Bad comfort and other cruel things of t34 it's what you have when enemy on your Homeland and you need to evacuate your factories (it was all knew when first t34 was produced, in fact t44 must be new tank, t34 was just timely replacement. And t34-85 has turret from t44). When you fighting for your life, comfort will be the last problem for you. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T 34 a much better tank than P430 May 2017, 11:49 AM Each tank had good and bad sides. P4 was more comfortable, with better optics radio and MG on top of it. T34-76 1941 mod. (t34-76 mod.1943 it's almost new tank, so many and huge were improvements) has more armor, better manuerable, but lack of comfort (hell heat in summer, troubles with start in winter), bad optics, unreliable radio. As one soviet tankman said "T34 is the best tank for serving in peaceful time". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T 34 a much better tank than P430 May 2017, 10:41 AM Pz4 with long barrel gun better than t34-76, but t34-85 better than P4. You could see this in game too. Main inconsistence, that in game German army of 1944-45, while soviet army of 1941. Only su-85 from 1943. Because for 1944-45 regular soviet medium it's t34-85, not 76. And su-100,su-122, not su-85 (it was stopped produced, when t-34-85 was started produced) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 29 May 2017, 17:56 PM IMHO for AA each side must have special unit. And every side have that. I think it woul be good delete all AA abilities from other units. I think it could give good strategic deep. You can counter any air abilities with your AA unit. For OKW Flacktrack will be good if it can shooting from move as other AA units. SU- M5 with quads OST - OStwind OKW - Flacktrack USF - AAHT UKF - Centaur In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 28 May 2017, 19:07 PM How about to give to IS-2 and KV-8 some usefull abilities? Cap point for heavy tanks...is weird and absolutely unfitting to their roles. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 27 May 2017, 11:56 AM How about flares to Stuka Dive bomb? Now propaganda arty got flares and i think Stuka Dive bomb must got flares too, because are only those 2 ability were in game without flares. In: COH2 Gameplay