Profile of EYFYHS

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 9

General Information


Thread: British Bastards: A Mobile Assault Regiment Guide30 Jul 2017, 21:20 PM Thank you very much for this guide, Hector. As a relatively new player I learnt a lot of things from this guide. In my opinion, strongly criticising a guide is not allowed unless u try to write one yourself. My only complain is that almost every new guide refers to 1v1 games. And new players are not playing 1v1 games very often. They prefer 2v2 or plus because they feel safer or count on the others until they r good enough. Thanx again and I hope other strategists will follow your example and share the knowloedge. In: Guides
Thread: DevM's USF without Tears14 Jul 2017, 16:04 PM Could you please state what are the right adaptations to this guide in 2v2 games with a brit establishment-heavy partner? BO, commanders, use or not of M20. Thanks in advance. In: Guides
Thread: 2v2 Games13 Jul 2017, 12:17 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2017, 09:03 AMShivara So does this mean that Axis is quite heavily favored in comparison to Allies atm? I mean 67% to 80% is a huge margin. Does this translate to success for lower players too? I am currently playing Allies with a friend (UKF + Soviets at Rank 900ish) and we consider joining the Axis cuz it seems stronger in this patch. What combo is better for them in 2v2? Double OKW or OKW + Ostheer? And which commanders would you guys recommend in this meta? What I believe is that taking Axis just because "they win" is wrong. Every faction has its own play style.I play a faction a lot, in order to learn the units,abilities,different commanders and when I'm full of it, I choose to squize another faction. I also believe that new players in most of the times prefer Russians where losing a whole conscript unit is not as bad as losing an obersoldaten unit for example. Anyway I think that for 2v2 games there is not so much material (e.g. guides) as for 1v1. That's a pity because playing with a friend is much more fun than playing alone. A good idea for the srtategists is to create a series of 2v2 guides with several compositions of factions: UK & USF, UK & RU or OB & OB, OB & WER. It's worth it I guess. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: 2v2 Games12 Jul 2017, 14:52 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2017, 14:48 PMpigsoup I am not a strategist but a strategist would tell you that a replay will help. Without replays, I can suggest build orders but that is too prescriptive. I am just gonna say USF is good in 2v2 and I will argue you guys are better off as UKF and USF than UKF and UKF. Watching 2v2 casts with USF will help, too. If you are noobs, are you guys noobs in a way that you guys micro bad or do not work together and play 2 1v1s? The latter, if that is the case, should be the priority to fix. Yes we 're trying to fix this too. We bought mics in order to communicate directly because sometimes we are playing 2 1v1 till late midgame. Are there any statistics for wins/losses in 2v2 games? In: Strategy Desk
Thread: 2v2 Games12 Jul 2017, 14:41 PM Hello people, I' ve been playing for 2 weeks 2v2 with a friend and we 're losing a lot of games as allies. We are old in strategy games but rather noobs in coh2. My friend plays always UKF (he cannot play any other faction) vanguard or cancer commander and I go USF. In most of the games we have a relatively good start but late game we really suck vs german tanks and forces. I play Calliope most of the times but I will try wolverines in order to face german tanks effectively (especially those damn tigers). Do u belive that taking both players UKF is better? If yes, which doctrines and plan? Are there any exemplary replays for allied play in 2v2 after the last patch anywhere? Thanx in advance. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: M1919 LMG7 Oct 2016, 14:14 PM Hello strategists, I would like to hear your opinion about this option and the commanders that give it, especially the Infantry Company Commander. I've just read the guide of CookiezNcream about this commander but it is 1 year old and I wonder if anything in this guide is right now. Ok the 5 ammo mines are gone today but what about M1919? Is it worthy, or nerfed so don't even think to waste the 70ammo? I only play 3v3 and 4v4 and just started to learn the US forces. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: 2V2 With a friend4 Oct 2016, 21:59 PM After some thoughts I decided to go US and let him settle his simcity ASAP. So I will act aggressively and he will be the fuel-flag guard. We also decided as new players not to play 2v2 yet but to start from 3v3, because we know the maps better and this is very imprtant in my opinion. Is the steam voice working? In: UKF Strategies
Thread: 2V2 With a friend28 Sep 2016, 15:19 PM Hi, I'm John and I am relatively new player. I always play 3v3 or 4v4 using brits or OKW. We decided with a friend to play 2v2 as allies (both brits). Is there a good strategy/BO? My friend will always choose the Emplacement Commander (he is his favourite). Who is the most suitable commander for me then? The guide for 2v2 brits in guides section seems to me a bit old and I don't have the Tank hunter commander. And another question: What is the best and lightest program to use to talk to each other in battle? (Except teamspeak). Thank you in advance. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Strategy discussion: The "No Volks" strategy22 Sep 2016, 11:49 AM Another problem here is the intense micromanagement the 2 kubels require. I barely can micromanage 1! 2 seems almost impossible to me... I would lose them very soon. I also saw some players to start with a kubel (for quick capping and avoiding battles)and then 2 more Sturmpioneers to have them as a blob of 3 total sturms. These 3 wiped 1-2 conscripts easily so you are not falling behind so much. But this is a matter of how good u micromanage them and how risky is the opponent not to retreat early his conscripts under sturm fire... In: Strategy Desk