Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Mortars/Indirect have broken the game8 Mar 2018, 17:31 PM Mortars and nades deal friendly fire, but artillery barely does if you're an allied faction. Now that's just plain counterintuitive. I can't see the rationale for artillery not hurting its own side if mortars do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen Sandbags8 Mar 2018, 17:29 PM It also just looks wrong. "Hey guys, we need some cover so rather than laying some sandbags let's build a metal hedgehog with holes in it." But for rear echelon the sandbag is useless why cuz tank traps get build faster Because a squad fits behind a sandbag. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen Sandbags8 Mar 2018, 17:25 PM Sandbags for Rear Echelon troops seems like the way to go to me. Buildable cover should look like cover. Would be nice for all sandbags to use the Conscript model too while we're at it. It looks nicer and would make it substantially harder for Volks and Tommies to make it monodirectional by using a territory point as a barded wire substitute. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mortars/Indirect have broken the game8 Mar 2018, 16:55 PM Personally I'd like to see all indirect weapons reworked to work the same way as howitzers do: remove their basic attack and buff their barrage to compensate. Mortars should be strong against static defences (both emplacements and camping infantry) but their current direct targeting of infantry squads makes them punish moving squads equally. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.5 Mar 2018, 14:41 PM That'd be 165 munitions for both. Removing the mutual exclusivity between Panzerschreck and Minesweeper would do. The Sturmpioneer Panzershreck wouldn't be half bad if it didn't cost your ability to minesweep. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The OKW Puma5 Mar 2018, 14:26 PM The Puma costs 320 MP, 70 FU, the M10 Wolverine costs 300 MP, 90 FU. The Puma has Aimed Shot, smoke canisters, a lackluster MG, slightly more agility and much greater LoS than the M10 (50 vs 30). The Wolverine is tougher, has a more powerful gun and comes out significantly later in the game than the Puma. If there's any vehicle to compare to Puma to it's the AEC, not medium tank destroyers. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.5 Mar 2018, 12:15 PM Is any of this remotely relevant to OKW Handheld AT. Ask ullumulu. They keep bringing it up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.5 Mar 2018, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2018, 11:59 AMullumulu im alter my post: their is no one toy in german faction which hasnt the allies too, except a camo MG (lol). Demo charges on wheels. Snipers with suppression. Cloaking tank destroyers. The last remaining medium armor call-in in the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.5 Mar 2018, 11:56 AM It has no upfront fuel cost. You can call in a Tiger Ace with no fuel in the bank whatsoever. If you should wasn't the question - whether or not using the Tiger Ace is a good idea is a situational judgement. Nevertheless, you said the Tiger Ace example wasn't to your satisfaction so I gave you cloaking machine guns instead. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Handheld AT solution.5 Mar 2018, 11:12 AM noone talked about the same cost etc...only toys. Tiger ace is a fast shooting tank. like vet 3 pershing In a strategy game everything exists in the context of everything else. Comparing units without comparing resource costs, opportunity costs and timing windows will lead you to flawed conclusions. But if you want a mechanic that doesn't appear in SOV, USF or UKF - - cloaking machine guns. In: COH2 Balance