Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Nerf Trees2 Jul 2018, 20:14 PM The obvious solution to this tree problem is to nerf UKF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS2 Citadel faction win rate2 Jul 2018, 20:04 PM I don't think UKF is too hard to fix provided the decision makers abandon its "crutch unit" philosophy. Compensating for lacking important tools by making one or two units crazy strong for their cost hasn't worked well in practice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf Trees2 Jul 2018, 19:52 PM We have judged that trees are underperforming. Therefore, each tree now has a 20% chance to be a Teller Mine in disguise. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework2 Jul 2018, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2018, 16:30 PMLoopDloop I really like this idea. Just for further clarity, are you proposing that it be like the current garrisoning system in live where the whole squad sits in it as a separate entity (like they do in buildings) or something like ye olde Coh1 emplacements or the okw base flak cannons? They'd use the existing emplacement garrison system. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework2 Jul 2018, 13:23 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2018, 13:16 PMEsxile not if you give ungarrisoned emplacements a durability malus. You wouldn't even need that. A Bofors that can't shoot back is useless. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework1 Jul 2018, 23:57 PM He wouldn't have much fuel that way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework1 Jul 2018, 16:46 PM The present 280 MP cost of a Bofors is hardly prohibitive. It'd be no easier to set up a Bofors in a difficult position for the opponent and easier than before to counter it. Just shell it, forcing out the garrisoned squad. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework1 Jul 2018, 16:42 PM and once the enemy finally succeeds in almost bringing it down after a big investment The same investment as clearing a building. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework1 Jul 2018, 16:03 PM When an emplacement is about to go down the squad could just evacuate and only the very reduced build cost would be lost. That's the point. You make the emplacement itself a lower investment but in turn nerf it by making it rely on a garrisoned squad to operate. Because it's reliant on the garrisoned squad inside to do anything it's also vulnerable to anything that flushes squads from buildings. They'd essentially be the old UKF password-protected trenches with guns on them. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF Emplacement Rework1 Jul 2018, 14:23 PM They're not decrewed. I'm suggesting taking the existing emplacement garrison mechanic and locking everything behind it rather than one ability. In: COH2 Gameplay