I know that ball rolls both ways, but some aspect of the game should be the same for each faction...That is my opinion and that is why I asked you about your reasons to say that.
It is OK for me than some factions has 3 tiers and others has 4 tiers, it is OK that some factions can get t0 mg-42 while other factions cannot, but then, there are some things that for the sake of the balance should be equally accesible and in the same conditions for all of them....An example of this are FRP´s and how EFA factions are in a clear disvantage that turn the balance in favour of WFA factions...
Whit mines, it is the same, in my opinion, that FRPs.
Is it not for you?? that´s ok, but I would love to know your reasons...That´s all.
I literally made a post in this thread about agreeing that Riflemen should lay down mines faster lol. However it should't be at vet 0, thast is just too much. We have enough freebees in this game already. |
so in top of only having mines through doctrine, as if that wasn´t enough disvantage, you think USF should keep this disvantage until vet1 or vet2 or vet3?
why?
You mean like USF has vehicle crews that can repair crits instantly and repair their own vehicles and have RE units that can repair vehicles fast, but the Soviet and Ostheer factions need at least vet 2 to get just a fraction of USF´s repair rates?
Ball rolls both ways my friend. |
|
Yeah its pretty slow. Could do with faster mine laying once they reach vet though. |
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198038732900
998 posts talking about a game he has exactly 12 games in. Best requirements for suggestions to change game mechanics.
And here you are, never offering any solutions or suggestions, only whining about playercards. |
My point exactly.
Dude we agree on something. Have you drugged me in my sleep?
Perhaps it is time we cease hostilities towards another and adopt my views fully. |
My vote is on incendiary/wp grenades on sturmpios and an isg smoke barrage. The former would make the incendiaries a lot more valuable, as they aren't on spammed main infantry, but on an expensive unit that you will only make 2 of at the most and that is close quarters, so couldn't care less about whether their targets are in cover (10m rule). It would also mean that volks gotta rely on something else to be effective too, and would open a little more counterplay as you know "those are the only guys with the incendiary." I don't understand why the latter doesn't already exist.
|
Wait yeah. If they get two m3s, then isn't it definitely worth getting a rak? Because they won't know until it blows one of them up as long as they hit the m3 with a bit of rifle fire first.
Well I wonder why.
Because everyone wants to play double OKW |
Yeah man but it takes very alot of time to find a game since everybody plays axis
Yeah feel forced to play allies myself due to queue times lol |
Just like not taking your children to the Catholic church.
Exactly |
Since this thread regards OKW vs Brits: I recently had a game on Minsk Pocket vs Brits where he locked down the middle with 2 Vickers, a UC and a trench. I found it difficult to flank because I have to walk so far around that he had enough time to reposition. How to best deal with this?
One or two leigs will make him cry. If you protect them they will never be touched. |
Netherlands
MotherGardener
They call me Zhe Schmoo
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
