Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Flame Halftrack5 Dec 2018, 12:03 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 11:41 AMKatitof Not being able to steamroll whole factions early game with no support is hardly same as becoming piece of shit. And its not supposed to perform better in late game(although its THE very best and cheapest light vehicle with THE very best scaling in game thanks to being immune to 2nd ATG shot being a kill shot at vet) , its T34 of light vehicles, mobile, cheap, fights both infantry and armor, effective in numbers, but outclassed by more expensive stuff. It is the the light vehicle with becomes so fast obsolet that quick. 251 can still be used as refresh or flamer. Same for M5+good AA ability (better than 222) and inf-suppression. T70 can capture points and also in late-game its gun really works good because german-inf don't get AT that that mass (Long ago I used Schreck or saw them on PnzGrens). AEC can still pen mediums and support. 222 only is good with Vet2 with sigh-bonus. Or with Scope. But it is a main-line unit in my opinion. A must-have (Ostheer is kind of build around it in my opinion, like StuG G) it should get some boost in lategame. I am for a bloob-counter like Centaure (like 6 shots of 251-FlaK for little aoe buff) or a pen-buff on time. Replacing the infantry-scan. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack5 Dec 2018, 11:38 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 02:22 AMNaOCl Katitof makes good points here, 222 beats british at gun, and it beats vickers. If you dont have AeC or PIATS yet, you're dead. Royal-Engeneers become AT-Grenade. So 222 becomes a piece of shit again. I am for a Vet or tech-ability for increaced penetration to perform better in late-game. Back to topic. I think we all agree now, that the 251 changes arn't that huge and OK. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?5 Dec 2018, 11:32 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 11:22 AMthekingsown10 I think the Brummbar's random and unjustified mass nerfing is really unacceptable. It should have the high armour it did because its shells can be dodged fairly easily by infantry and fire very slowly with no turret not to mention how bad the Brummbar is at getting stuck due to the abysmal pathing system. The Brummbar is Wehr's only true late game infantry counter as the Ostwind (which obviously is left untouched despite the terrible state it has been left in) is quite frankly a joke and is completely outclassed by the T70 , Centaur and any other allied AI. Still... I am massively repeating myself. But it could be easy balanced at the current stage. IF WE DON'T DO IT LIKE NOW! -StuG E into T3. -Brummbär replaces StuG E in 2 commanders as call-in. (Mechanized and revamp Defensive-Commader) -Ostwind into T4. Becomes new weapon-provile (~OKW-base without suppresion and reload after 3-sots) and a suppresion ability on time (~like OKW-base without reload-animation for 30-45 sec. cooldown 2-3mins) To compensate the suppression of Ostwind, HMG42 can be put into T1 again. Also Grens can be moved to T0 like in beta was. (so also the side-tech with T1 for faust makes sence) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?5 Dec 2018, 11:04 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 10:43 AMJae For Jett Going by the information thats available on your playercard, 91% of your matches are on axis. 87% ostheer, 4% OKW. Just some food for thought. Same for me. But still, it is about fairness and obvious confidences. Beside of the fan-boys there are also people which want a balanced game. So, I hate playing Brits. Hate their autio-synchronisation and their broken units. OP and shitty at same time... I also don't like playing US, simply no fan of blobbs and the tech-system. Also don't like playing OKW, same reason as above. Soviets are stabil. Sometimes way too smooth. But yes… back to topic. You are destroying the only hope Ostheer often has. Mainly in 3vs3+. In a game PaKs counter MG-bunkers but high-tech AI vehilces are worse in their jop than a 0815 main-line unit… with that nerfs a normal T34/76 is better at countering infantry than Brummbär. With the range buff, armor should be untouched. You want balance? Make Brummbär be changed with StuG E and put it into T3. Make it a expensive call-in so we don't have to speak about it anymore. And finally nerf tankhunters as Elefant and Jagdtiger and buff normal units instead. It can't be normal that eveything Alliis have it made to younter that shit. And don't come with the PaK40 argument. It is also time to nerf 6p-pounder after royal-engeneers get AT-nade. With all that changes the ranges don't fit. Why not set ranges new: 70: Jagdtiger 65: Elefant, ISU152 60: SU85, Jagdpanzer IV [PaK40, Zis, 6pounder] 55: Panther, Jackson, Firefly, SU76 50: StuG G [Püppchen] 45: Comet, Pnz4, T34/85, Tiger-I (Vet2 50), Pershing 40: T34/76, T70, Ostwind, 222 35: Brummbär, Centaur 1. Set all tank-hunter with turret at same range. 2. Lower the range of AI-tanks like Brummbär and Centaur. 3. Set clear differences between price-differences like PanzerIV and T34/76. etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stug5 Dec 2018, 10:45 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 08:51 AMVan Der Bolt Recently I tried to kill a OST werfer with Su-76, and was really upset that i cannot 1-shot it like any other medium can 1-shot rocket arty... Don't compare the SU76 with real tanks. It is more like a Puma without turret and some compensations + better path-finding. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?5 Dec 2018, 10:40 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2018, 06:27 AMIncendiaryRounds Everyone complaining about Brum batshit op is just exaggeration. It needed a very small tweak at best. Just like a few mths back EVERYONE complained 222 op because VonIvan and a few others spammed them. The REAL problem was that allied players couldn't fathom the fact that the 222 wasn't a piece of shit anymore and that a pair of 222s can no longer be stopped by a single zook or pair of ptrs. Just pure disrespect for the 222. About a month later, 222 spam meta was dead because SU and USF players finally located the "buy at gun button" on the screen. So where's the nerf for the 222? I thought so. the 222 wasn't op, it was the allied players being too lazy to adapt when they already have plenty of tools to deal with it. Same thing can be said with the Brum. People saying that an at gun can't stop a Brum. NO SHIT, SHERLOCK! Do u expect a single pak to stop Kv8 or croc? If you're gonna rely on at guns (cuz somehow u fked up and can't afford a cheap TD when Ost player can afford Brum) GET TWO OF THEM! Secondly the Brum DOESN'T one shot at guns anymore. Not full health crew. If each crewmen are wounded, then yes, a likely one hit. The only crew that get oneshot by brum is raketen crew, because they're bunched up and sherman HE has the same effect on them. And then there are players that say you cant get the kill on a Brum if it overextends. Not true at all. If u can't get the kill it means the Brum is not overextending or you didn't flank to get rear shots. 100% true. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?4 Dec 2018, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2018, 18:31 PMTheGentlemenTroll Yeah back then TDs weren't all that great at their job so the meta was Heavy Tanks and Heavy TDs. Game-foundation was better. After all that small changes CoH2 becomes a real mutant. Somehow it lives… but it is no good life. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Overnerfed Brummbar. Why am I not surprised?4 Dec 2018, 18:27 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2018, 18:18 PMTheGentlemenTroll The high armor value wasn't really that great against allied TDs, arguably the biggest reason the old Panther was bad was how RNG based it was if a TD penned or not and how low its health value was behind the armor. The health buff gave the Panther much more consistent staying power rather than armor which was more based on if it bounced or not. So technically the armor nerf for a health buff helped the panther against TDs. 2 years ago Jackson was worse, SU85 was worse and ISU152 was worse. That was because I told 2 years ago. ^^ The only hope I see is, when we nerf Ele, Jagdtiger, ISU152 more, so we can finally balance line-unit versus line-unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack4 Dec 2018, 18:14 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2018, 18:10 PMThamor I would let Vicker's penetrate it as well as MG42 can Daimler. Anyway Daimler armour is too high anyway as it was the same as 222 --> Armoured Car, not a damn light tank. Only with Vet1 ability. Which Vickers gecomes passive heat with Vet too. Edit: German T2 and T3 is simply dead. 251 can work with 100% micro. And Panzer 4 can work, if map has many corners to hide. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack4 Dec 2018, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2018, 14:52 PMKatitof Yeah, I know you wouldn't. It doesn't really work in non competitive modes like 3v3 and 4v4. Doesn't change the fact that it is the go-to way in 1s and 2s. And no, tommies do not have high dps against it, its the very reason why 222 is so extremely effective against UKF and vickers can be just flanked/circled, because guess what? No AT snare on anything, but that is about to change. Thats is why the 222 got so expensive. It is NOT to waist it and it will be a waist at such situations. Also it becomes irrelevant in lategame. Instead of T70 and AEC. Ok, it is better at AA as Ostwind... If you fight frontal versus 2 Tommies at a range the MG has good DPS you will lose 2/3 of its HP. Thats not how a AI verhicle should work like. And UK will get a AT-grenade. The way to go, more armor for the 222. Normal rifels and normal MGs shouldn't pen it. Lets say, Vickers without Vet and Maxim. In: COH2 Balance