Profile of SolidSteel

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 74

General Information


Thread: Buff Wehrmacht29 Jun 2016, 06:10 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2016, 22:58 PMstonebone000 Wehrmacht, usf bugs notwithstanding, is unplayable. Well, very difficult to play. Grenadiers are the worst infantry in the game, ffs cons wreck them as long as you aren't mentally handicapped. Mg42 just gets smoked out, unuseable. Panzergrenadiers come too late to save you from the infantry blob. Their strength is supposed to be in the late game but the Panthers DPS is abhorrent. The tiger gets slammed by comets and the new Su85, even su76 spam shuts down everything short of an elefant. Sure the scout car is cheap, but it's still bad. Pak is a good gun but it can't snipe infantry like the 6 pounder. Even if it could it wouldn't be able to stop the new penals from slapping you in the face. Panzer 4 is good but the Cromwell comes earlier and is the same for cheaper, but is markedly better at anti infantry with its capability to run troops over. The new t34 is better at anti infantry work and is much cheaper while being able to beat a panzer 4 on even terms. Stug spam helps sure but again not versus the bazooka-at rifle grenade blobs.. whatever. Wehrmacht needs help. I suggest Grenadiers upgraded to a 5 man team, meaning their dps would be increased by .25, and their survivability as well. They would now be able to stand a chance vs Riflemen and tommys. Cons might need to be buffed a bit to compensate. Maybe switch mg42 and grens in tech, and place panzergrenadiers in t1. That way Wehrmact could stop the steam roller blob a little easier. Just buff the panther, it shoots too slow to be good. Reload minus half a second. Or moving accuracy to .70 so it could actually use its mobility as a tank hunter. Increase scout car cost but also its cannons pen slightly so it's more viable as a light vehicle. If you disagree you're wrong. Well, the way you argument things is kind of aggressive sis, but i CAN tell you for a fact, and from recent experience, this: USF SEVERELY outclasses Ost, i mean, times over, you can argue about heavy armor play, but with buffed at plus pershing i can compete easily with my opponents, while my early and midgame infantry and combined arms play is flatly better than ost's. Been playing USF 1 game and another of ost, repeating that over and over. USF is just better in the global scale of usability and power curve. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Playing as alli is totally easy27 Jun 2016, 10:00 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2016, 09:46 AMCartoonVillain Indeed, combined arms is very potent with USF tank crews these days. Kappa In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Playing as alli is totally easy27 Jun 2016, 09:36 AM Im currently liking USF a lot more, cause i can now translate my combined arms from Wher into them, but that only also allows me to notice the difference in flat performance even easier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blobs of the past 27 Jun 2016, 09:11 AM Blobbing is a shit mechanic and a complete display of lack of skill, best thing is, its endorsed by the devs themselves, they said such in a comment IIRC. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Playing as alli is totally easy27 Jun 2016, 08:55 AM As bad as his english is, I found 1 point valid. The sinergy USF has now with the mortar is brutal, you get the best baseline infantry with the best mortar ( and t0 ). Usf had such powerful inf cause it had to compensate for the lack of support weapon play, and now you have the overloaded inf AND the best mortar right out the bat. This double effect is whats causing such grief XD. The grens can be officially considered the worst infantry now lol, well just behind the cons, but at least those dont get wiped in 1 shot by a snipermachinegun-mortar. XD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: panthers reload speed27 Jun 2016, 06:28 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2016, 01:14 AMJaedrik 60 muni autoloader You'd have to make it VERY noticeable, as you're going to sink 120 muni plus its already high price. Maybe cap it behind vet2? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.27 Jun 2016, 06:05 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2016, 18:35 PMMettiu Maybe you can first check facts. It's lot better then ost counterpart. I played US few times and it is OP as hell. After few games I stopped playing US. That much boring is how much OP that unit is. And maybe you should try reading before replying blindly to people, that's exactly what i meant, it's NOT copy pasted from the wher mortar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.25 Jun 2016, 13:24 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2016, 02:35 AMArclyte I guess fighting the copy/pasted version of the wehr mortar suddenly makes the unit "OP". why am I not surprised copy pasted ? god the bias can make people blind lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly Tulip Stun24 Jun 2016, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2016, 12:19 PMElSlayer I think it is fine for PaK40. It is quite fragile and have low mobility after all. Also PaK40 TWP is not actually a point and click ability as it don't bypass weapon cooldown. That ability has been bugged for ages, it resets the deployment on the pak and may not fire if it doesnt automatically re-adquire its target, and it fails to do so half the time, effectively wasting ammo. It should be a load type ability, like the mg inc rounds, triggering a reload animation and causing the effect on the next shot, not limited by time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: panthers reload speed22 Jun 2016, 08:20 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 07:21 AMGrim Including vet bonuses? I'd make that swap any day of the week And abilities too, yeah id be up for it no questions asked lol. In: COH2 Balance