Profile of RealName

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 276

General Information


Thread: How would you address new factions' powercreep?14 Jul 2016, 22:21 PM -increase all CQC squads' LOS (so that they have more sight than long/med range squads) -add a debuff to CQCs that increases received accuracy by 15% when in negative/no cover, and only disappears when in cover (acts like tommy cover buff) CQCs can't yolocharge from open ground and faceroll units in cover anymore. Increased sight allows them to plan flanks on long range units more effectively. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Too much artillery?14 Jul 2016, 22:02 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jul 2016, 16:32 PMLucas Troy In 2014, many high level 1v1s ended with a duel between a JT and an ISU. The ISU was much stronger back then, as was the JT. ohh back then yeah. thought you were talking about current ISU In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Too much artillery?14 Jul 2016, 15:57 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jul 2016, 12:54 PMLucas Troy "OKW player builds JT, allied players build ISU to counter JT." wait wut In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Italian Faction 14 Jul 2016, 15:49 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jul 2016, 12:54 PMnigo +1 for Italian army or German-Italo army. Afrika Korps + Italy :> (i mean motorcycle tanks ffs! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L3/33 ) And maybe a Brit/Afrika Korps campaign along with it? In: Lobby
Thread: Will Relic ever fix the amount of flawed commanders?14 Jul 2016, 00:14 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2016, 18:29 PMDaciaJC To be fair, Relic said how long ago they were revamping the War Spoils system? They did finally deliver after a couple of years. When new Afrika Korps faction comes out, then we'll get our commander revamps! right? ha ha ... In: Lobby
Thread: How would you address new factions' powercreep?14 Jul 2016, 00:09 AM Since some people would prefer new factions' nerfs than Ostheer buffs, I'd like to hear suggestions on how the WFA and Brit powercreep would be fixed. For me I'd like to see Riflemen vet get rebalanced from -45% received accuracy to something like -30% received accuracy and -20% reincforce cost instead. As for Brits, since I don't really play them much, maybe rebalance cheap Sappers to something else? And since OKW has been butchered enough already, I don't think it has anymore issues other than free flak and sturmpio repair speed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just some thoughts on Ostheer units currently. 13 Jul 2016, 23:39 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2016, 23:26 PMVuther The latter, so we don't demand they mess around with Soviets like a month later. Then ya better hope lelic doesn't decide to be lazy or do the classic relic thing, which is quite possibly upset the balance even further after their done with all those changes. (I mean they tried to rebalance OKW and look what happened lol. Imagine if they try rebalancing all 3 facs, as opposed to rebalancing ost and maybe some of sov) Maybe I should make a thread about this.. Kappa In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just some thoughts on Ostheer units currently. 13 Jul 2016, 23:20 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2016, 07:15 AMeasierwithaturret It's one thing to buff underused units so they can perform their intended role, look at the good changes to previously underused units such as Brumbarr or SU-76 as an example. That works to fill gaps in a faction's overall capability and open up new options for play. It's another thing entirely to buff commonly-used units as that has much wider-reaching implications, plus it doesn't really improve gameplay as much as you just end up relying even more on a small selection of units and strats. People are talking about how absurd the new factions' power creep has gotten. So people want to nerf the new 'better' factions to make them in line with the 'outdated' EFA (Wehrmacht especially). I'm saying relic would more likely buff Wehrmacht than nerf USF, UKF, and OKW altogether. What would be easier: buffing 3 Wehrmacht infantry units(grens/pios/pzgrens) and 2-3 tanks(pzIV/panther/tiger) or nerfing UKF's sapper blobs, stock Tigers, cost-efficient steam rollers... OKW's stock god unit, free flaks, super glue repairs... and USF's terminator riflemen with their double LMGs and -45% received accuracy, etc... ? The issue here is Ostheer's wipe-prone, underperforming infantry and it's subpar late game. Soviets back then crutched on doctrinal stuff and did fine, with the new patch they don't need to rely on doctrines as much and as a result are much stronger. Ostheer can't crutch on sht coz almost all of their arsenal is sucky. Nice that the niche 'underused' units have been buffed(flame ht and brummbar) but they can't really be crutched on (unless made borderline OP), since Ostheer core units still suck weinerschnitzel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just some thoughts on Ostheer units currently. 13 Jul 2016, 06:27 AM I find the possibility of relic nerfing new armies' power creep highly unlikely. Whereas buffing one faction would be easier to balance, nerfing ALL of the overpowered aspects of the new factions would take longer and could lead to potentially more unbalanced stuff because of all the redesigns. As opposed to rebalancing the few underpowered units of one faction, eh? At least, realistically thinking, that's what I think relic is gona do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer needs these beauties13 Jul 2016, 03:36 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2016, 23:40 PMsiuking666 ... and start blowing bodies up and limbs flying all over. heh. actually, one of the first things I noticed when CoH2 was released back then was that my Tiger no longer gibs models why don't all explosive kills trigger gibs anyway. lelic In: COH2 Gameplay