The only allied infantry thats overperforming vs axis tanks is USF riflemen because of the fact that they can both equip AT and snare at the same time.
|
Thread: WBP 1.728 Jan 2017, 21:57 PM
i wouldn't touch panther yet until other overperforming tanks are nerfed |
So because the weapon can be captured it deserved to be OP? lol
Honestly how the fk do you let a LM get captured anyway???!!! it can fire safely from distance, its not like the PZwerfer were you have to close in |
Overall still, a really good patch well done. My only issue is with the STUG E being treated like a light vehicle even though its a tank. I agree with nerfing its offensive capabilities and price but ther was no need to reduce its HP by making it get killed by 3 shots like a LV because its alot harder to use and evade with when compared to other LV's. |
This unit is quiet clearly over performing, and is disgusting to watch when i see replays with it ingame. The people saying its fine are probably the same n00bs who abuse it ingame.
Even if you take it out, the enemy will just re crew it anyway |
with the new piats brits should be fine without snares. The part i agree with you is punishing early unfair base rushes, if thats the case i'd make the brit bunkers in base effective vs's light vehicles like OKW's flak. |
Nerfing comet will not help church get better
Yes it will, if comet wernt so good, we will be seeing some nice Armour combos such as firefly in combination with Churchill |
It already does it job as damage soaker so it doesn't need armour buff, and its main gun is already effective vs infantry and it also has decent pen for AT. The reason no one uses it cuz of the over performing comet |
I honestly didn't mind too much of penals beating grens and Volks at all ranges, due to the lack of AT made them venerable to LV's and thats the risk/reward you took to go t1, but now you've got some modders that have come in and gave them PTRS which has just screwed everything up.
I would have left penals as they are with powerful AI but increase the reinforce cost and time so they bleed you more. |
Guys, stop derailing the thread will ya?
Soviets were a faction that was suppose to have weak stock options, but strong doctrinal choices (which is why they have so much good stuff in 1 doctrine) and i fully understand why it never worked out and so they received necessary buffs to ther stock options which i guess, includes the new PTRS changes.
Shouldn't therefore, the doctrines receive a rework? |