Go in game and try driving the 222 around, it handles like the kettengrad, and its massive!
but you saw bergetiger? Its the dumbest thing ever |
It has less cover than steppes, and its hard to have less than that map |
That only happens if they see you first |
Coh1 pathfind sucked as never any other thing, specialy bergetigers one |
Gammon is T4 and its locked behind a specialization, thats why its worse than satchel? There is always a counterargument
its still not on a specialized unit, but in the main infantry, an specialized unit should always be better at his job than the all around ones |
Oh man, osttrupen will be something after vet now |
there's more to armor then just the regular medium tank. Both axis factions get the panther and the okw specifically get the King tiger. The british have the excellent comet (and formerly awesome) churchill on top of the cromwell.
giving both the sov and the US decent medium tank is not going to change the fact the axis still have access to superior tanks in their tech tree. I would have prefer buffing the sherman instead of giving rifleman the terminator veterancy.
dont worry, im not saying that soviets and USF need everything, just that British are a combination of the best parts of the other factions |
i mean the brits have a FANTASTIC medium tank that is also cheap AND they can get the comet... meanwhile the soviets....
lets be serious, the british got the best part of both axis and allied cakes, and even then they managed to not make it look ridiculous overpowered |
Why people go for puma instead of rushing panther?
Why people go Stuart instead of waiting for sherman?
Why people go P4/Panther instead of stalling for KT?
Why people use osttruppen instead of building more grens?
Why people go conscript ppsh/PTRS instead of guards/shocks?
Why people go StuG-E instead of Ostwind?
Why people go SU-76 instead of SU-85?
Timing, cost, cost effectiveness. All of it can impact the unit and its validity.
Unit doesn't have to be improvement over what you have there as stock units, but it needs to be cost efficient enough.
People avoid 34/76 because its NOT cost efficient.
Yes, its cheapest med in game, but it doesn't make it cost efficient, just like M-42 is not cost efficient in relation to ZiS-3.
Relic made a tank, so its effective and efficient exclusively in numbers and in early enough game stage.
Then they increased its menpower cost and pop cap, so getting it in numbers is not efficient.
The tank is bad for the cost, even if the cost is relatively low in comparison to other tanks of its tier.
Its not even being bad vs other tanks. Its about being bad for the cost it have itself. You can reliably win vs T34/76 using puma.
i know. But... I feel like T34-76 cant come earlier, nor be cheaper. It may need a total rework instead of juat exchange to nondoctrinal to give it any sense than "just a conscript among the guards". Because right now soviets are the only factions that have units that have units with jobs overlapping, both infantry and armor. Actually, i think that they should take another look to the faction again. |
Still, OKW doesnt has anything appart of pz4 to fill that medium role, but if T34-85 becomes undoctrinal why would you choose to get other tanks that are exactly the same but just with worse stats, cheaper, but as far as i saw people preffers to go for the expensive and effective than numerous and cheap ones, specialy when it refers to armor |