Profile of Cafo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 245

General Information


Thread: Troop training feedback2 Dec 2015, 13:50 PM My god people complain about anything, its not broken why fix it, just ruining variety for people who like using non viable fun commanders. It's not even good and people complain..mind blown. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will the Calliope have acess to its main gun?2 Dec 2015, 12:00 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 06:37 AMSugmar I think - it is better to buy Sherman. It served its purpose, and then I upgrade it. Or kaleopa - if I need artillery or Jumbo, if I need a battering ram. It spravidlivie than playing as the Red Army - waiting for the release of the doctrine of elite art. Probably the most fair minded idea, make it an upgrade like tulip rockets on the firefly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should OKW shrek be moved to another teir/unit?2 Dec 2015, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2015, 11:42 AMBlackart Schreck should be moved to other unit - obers or sturms, removed completely or moved to a commander as a doctrial upgrade like ptrs to cons. Volks should cost more but be more effective agains inf, there should be an option to give them an close combat package with mp 40 and mp 44 and they should have panzerfaust or german anti-tank rifle - Panzerbüchse. Giving best infantry AT weapon to a core tanky 5 men T0 unit with 5 vet was a bad design from the beginning. when have volks ever been tanky lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?2 Dec 2015, 11:29 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 23:59 PMImagelessbean Again this is really not true. Units regularly receive vet 4 and 5. Harder on some (Kubel) almost guaranteed on others (Volks). You get the bonus of vet 4 and 5 because OKW had few tanks and their infantry had to be able to stand up alone to armor in the late game. Now they get it and have no downsides. Yes but they need that extra vet to be on par with 3 vetted allied infantry, for example 3 vet rifles are insane. Volks are bad, maybe not after update but while they had penalty... isg got nerfed... kubel nerfed...fuck yeah remove that penalty. All these perks Headquarters give are good but for full value from them they need to be fielded where they can get destroyed and is even further punished by the fact you must buy trucks.(im not basing this purely on 1v1)As well they made you start with 30 less fuel and increased the fuel required for mech and t4 USF tier upgrades give them captain which is nutty and there own forward retreat/heal point later on, so its not like they are the only faction getting good rewards with their tier upgrades, I agree OKW will be strong after this update THATS THE POINT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Sherman 76mm gun upgrade?2 Dec 2015, 11:07 AM The Sherman in real life was superior to the panzer 4 in nearly every way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?1 Dec 2015, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 21:43 PMAustralian Magic Removed suppression is not "a nerf" because now it has different role. For example you can chase SU sniper, how this is a nerf? I find it as a buff. It's literally so blatantly obvious it was nerfed they lowered the mp and made it cost 0 fuel, suppression is way better than adding some armor, it forces a retreat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?1 Dec 2015, 20:09 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 19:55 PMImagelessbean None of the OKW bonuses are justified without a cost. In past games you paid a real cost (fuel and munitions) and a opportunity cost (timing of units). To offset this you had cheap tech to keep you in the game, and lots of bonuses. Now you get all those bonuses at no cost, while other factions literally have to pay to have those things. How, and I mean this, can any faction keep up? OKW should feel resource starved by having to pay for all these upgrades, all over the place. You want healing, fine here it is for x fuel and y mp. You want vet 4, fine just pay x fuel and y mp, and you can start to use it. You want panthers, no problem, just pay x fuel and y mp and you can unlock it. You want a giant suppressing gun that has 40 range and can penetrate tanks on your TIER UPGRADE? Not an issue, here just pay for that too. It can have all this stuff but it should come at cost. The Luchs is still a devastating chase unit. It is the first unit that can safely ignore base defenses and chase infantry all the way home. How will Brits stop it? If it doesn't hit a mine a retreating unit is always going to be wiped. At vet 1 it can cloak and disappear anyway. Also saying, well vet 4 and 5 are rare so who cares. Is like saying, well the unit is OP but it is not able to appear on the field often so when it does who cares that the opposing team will just lose even if they played better? Imagine if the Croc got 5 levels of vet, people would be screaming in the forums and a hotfix would be needed. In team games vet 5 is extremely common especially on larger heavier German vehicles. Well its partially reasonable/relevant , firstly why should you suffer a resource penalty the full length of the game for vet bonuses rarely achieved? Would you choose that if you had a choice? Probably not. Volks atm are shit, they are spammed for impact and dare I say only good with high vet? It's not always about how good a faction is but how it contrasts with the opposition At the end of the day its getting this much needed rework for a reason.. The whole resource penalty for crap isn't working. And Allied is too strong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?1 Dec 2015, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 18:43 PMOmega_Warrior The vet 5 doesn't bother me as much as the quality of armor they get with such little teaching. Even if you get rid of vet 5 it doesn't make up for the fact they are going to be rolling around with Panthers and super p4s 12 minutes in. There is no way for allies to keep up with that especially with schreks making life difficult for most allied mediums. They need to bring back OKWs resource starved late game by upping the cost of their late armor. Don't you have to pay for the half tracks to make HQ's now or did I read that wrong in notes? so wouldn't it be just that? Making them pay more for tiering? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW shrek be moved to another teir/unit?1 Dec 2015, 18:39 PM Sturms getting them would be cute, but mainline infantry are literally the only ones fitting or qualified to have shrecks. IMO just leave it, every "faction" has their perks, that's an okw perk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December Update1 Dec 2015, 12:34 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 12:24 PMKatitof Its suppression is gone. Its utility changed, it have different role now. And anyone who want to harass far away resource points with low risk. I get it , you can use it for quick caps but its ability to harass has been greatly diminished with no suppression, compared to buying a volk which are good at any point in the game I think they are making it near worthless. In: COH2 Gameplay