Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Increase light jaegars price2 Jan 2019, 12:10 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 12:07 PMLeOverlord Please tell me that you are referring to their vet 3 and vet 5 target size. It's very low indeed. Their default target size seems fine. Even their vet 0 stat are high when combined with the "father land". It a combination of target and K98 DPS at close range that makes them perform rather good even at close range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About upcoming new commanders2 Jan 2019, 11:57 AM On the issue of commander imo one should start by removing OP combinations like Elephant/reckon plane/stuka dive bomb. Commanders should either have Super heavies/premium mediums or powerful off map not both. Commanders should either have Super heavies/premium mediums or weapons upgrades not both. That would make increase the number of commander in the meta allot more than revamping a single commander. In: Lobby
Thread: Increase light jaegars price2 Jan 2019, 11:48 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 11:44 AMLeOverlord Did anyone test how various CQB units perform against JLI? I mean, what are the casualties for units trying to close the distance and fight them? I discussed with Jae For Jett the idea of fighting them with LMGs, but since the G43 ignores cover, he advised me (along with other players) to use CQB troops. The problem is that their low target size and the 3 K98 make they rather good even at close range. To make thing even worse JLI can sprint away from units. That is why I have suggested to make the K98 have a flat DPS curve bellow 10, so that they worse at CQC and to remove sprint. That would make them good long range and weak close range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price2 Jan 2019, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 09:10 AMLeOverlord I got another question : How does their Ambush and First Strike perform compared to British Commandos? Worse, even or better? Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 09:28 AMKatitof Its the same bonus values. Pretty much all AI ambush bonuses are the same, 50% dmg for 5 seconds. That is inaccurate. JLI and Commandos get different bonuses for first strike and have different camo than ostheer camo that also get sprint in package, while some unit get no bonuses when firing from cover (AT infantry/weapons also.) Commandos Veterancy 2 grants +35% speed during ambush for 3.25 seconds; Veterancy 0 sprint Ambush bonus removed. (they do get x1.50 accuracy at vet 0) Since the 2 unis have different optimum ranges it is difficult to compare. JLI want to use their bonus a long to mid range while commandos want to use their bonus close range and chase the enemy on retreat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New units for the new commanders 2 Jan 2019, 11:19 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 10:33 AMSmartie ... I start with the easy choice - OKW's tankhunter squad. These unit would be a worthy addition to the faction because OKW doesn't have good handheld AT units. I could see 2 options for the Panzerjäger squad: 4 men unit starts with 2 ant-tank rifles 39 and can be upgraded to 2 schrecks for 100 mun. 4 men unit already comes equipped with double schrecks I would prefer the first option. I would rather see a 5 men squad that comes with 5 k98+2 panzerfaust. This weapons can be toggle and are about bazooka level. It would would be unique and balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW overhaul discussion2 Jan 2019, 03:26 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 03:04 AMNaOCl Adding extra fuel cost to KT would mean you can NEVER get 2 in a 1v1 game. That is probably a good thing, although I don't think you can get 2 in 1vs1 anyway. If losing the KT is crippling blow the unit can then be re-balanced and become more cost efficient, if the opponent lose 2-3 mediums only to see a new roll out in few seconds it is difficult to balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW overhaul discussion2 Jan 2019, 03:02 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 02:59 AMNaOCl Building a new T4 seems silly, why not have the KT have a call in cooldown that triggers upon death? .. I have made that suggestion for other super heavies tanks. Thought one could try something different for stock unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW overhaul discussion2 Jan 2019, 02:51 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2019, 02:44 AMNaOCl This is a cool idea, except the multiple KT idea. Could you elaborate on point 4)? What does make it a STUG mean? Literally change it to a stug? change its profile to be stug like? The suggestion is not to able to field multiple KT but to have to build a new T4 before you can replace the one you lost, the limit to one would remain. Imo one of issues with Super heavy tanks is that even if one sacrifices his unit to kill them the opponent can same time instantly replace them (especially in large mods). Allow more time before these unit can be replaced would help allot in balancing them better imo Currently JP gets allot of armor and HP with a weak gun for it cost. The idea here is to have a cheaper version with less armor, HP and pop, but keep the ranger to 60. It would serve a counter to medium tanks and TD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpionier 2 Jan 2019, 02:17 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 09:53 AMKatitof Because builder/repair units do not have great veternacy as they are not primarily combat units. /thread Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2019, 23:12 PMKatitof .... They have regular combat unit vet in comparison to mainline infantry squads. Glad to see that you changed your mind and you know agree with my post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW overhaul discussion1 Jan 2019, 22:15 PM Another solution for the Stuka would be to swap it with the Ostheer Mortar half truck (that could use a buff to incendiary round). That would make both units see more action. The MHT as an indirect fire support option something T2 lucks that Stuka as doctrinal rocket artillery without the T4. In: COH2 Balance