Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Volley fire on REs14 May 2018, 06:19 AM This ability is rather hard to balance. Imo it should scale with veterancy (and most other abilities also). In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper13 May 2018, 22:04 PM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2018, 20:01 PMFiresparks if you are going to cite your chart in an arguement, you should make sure the chart is updated. the FF accuracy value is outdated, its accuracy was nerfed to the same as the jp4. and even the, note how Axis TD consistently outdps the allied TD. The three highest dps value in the chart at 60 is the jagdtiger, the APCR jackson, and the jp4. the four highest at 50 is the jagdtiger, stug, APCR jackson, and jp4. the jackson need to spend munition to temporarily achieve the kind of dps achievable natively by the Axis TD. JP and FF have the same accuracy values bad FF get 110% bonus from the commander and it has a mid value 150% bigger than JP making more accurate. At range 60 FF has an accuracy of 0.044 while JP has an accuracy of 0.04, at range 45 firefly has an accuracy of 0.055 while the JP of 0.045. Firefly is simply more accurate than the JP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly need to be cheaper13 May 2018, 09:29 AM Jump back to quoted post12 May 2018, 21:16 PMFiresparks ... the Firefly's mid range advantage is the mid range distance, not modifier, and in effect it only affect accuracy and Penetration. secondly, Firefly isn't really more accurate in practice. both the firefly and jp4 get .04/.05/.06 accuracy scaling. Against a 22 size target that's already a 88% hit rate at 60m. The FF will hit 100% accuracy faster, but this is the kettle calling the pot black. If you would like to know more about TD accuracy, I made a more in-depth topic earlier: https://www.coh2.org/topic/69042/tank-destroyers-should-be-less-accurate FF is more accurate than the JP for 2 reason: 1) Tank commander increases FF accuracy 2) Having mid range x1.5 further away means that the accuracy increase faster the closer you get. Jump back to quoted post13 May 2018, 00:05 AMmurky depths This explains so goddamn much. Not Really, DPS without armor and target size value and at different ranges is not a very revealing comparison. more here: https://www.coh2.org/topic/62537/tds-vs-mediums-in-live-and-in-numbers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AA units performanche in comparison11 May 2018, 15:27 PM Quad is simply OP in the AA role, as it should be expected since its AA capabilities where increased by around x30 times. Generally speaking loiter planes should be redesigned imo, they should suffer "suppression" when under fire while being harder to shoot down. Their performance then could become more consistent. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager9 May 2018, 07:58 AM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2018, 07:42 AMStein Grenadier Rather odd that that change was in its own thread rather than in the supposed compiled changelog I mentioned. I made a mistake in the RA values. Though my opinion won't change. It's still a relatively fragile (to other elites) and expensive combat unit with a long battlefield cue and arrival. Making the FGs a weapon upgrade is something I disagree on. It is rather confusing (and sloppy) that commander changes have not made it to Patch notes. Everyone makes mistakes from time to time, some learn from them other do not, some even pretent they didn't. But you did check the patch notes, imo it not even your fault if it was not there as it should. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager9 May 2018, 07:29 AM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2018, 03:56 AMStein Grenadier I've taken the liberty of looking around the official changelog to check for RA changes for Falls- It's been 0.87 since 2014 and none of the succeeding updates mentioned any more changes towards its RA. .... As I already posted here: Fallschirmjäger Fallschirmjager are being adjusted to have better stock performance with only minor changes to their veterancy. Now paradrop into the field instead of infiltrating. Cost from 440 to 380 Reinforce cost from 38 to 36 Population from 8 to 9 Received accuracy from 0.87 to 0.83 Faust range from 15 to 18 Camouflages in cover when stationary; requires no veterancy Veterancy 5 range bonus removed Veterancy 3 received accuracy bonus removed Veterancy 4 accuracy bonus moved to veterancy 3 Veterancy 3 now provides a -20% weapon cooldown Veterancy requirements from 760/1520/3040/3800/5054 to 600/1200/2400/3000/3900 It is in the commander changes, since it is a doctrinal unit In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager8 May 2018, 11:08 AM I am not sure why one would consider that correcting factual errors in civilized manner as toxic. Fallschirmjäger cost 380 not 440 that is a simple fact, Fallschirmjäger camo is static that is a simple fact, there is nothing toxic about it. Even the user seems to like it the people correct his factual errors. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager8 May 2018, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post8 May 2018, 10:20 AMEsxile Lol if this is not a love demonstration, what could you do without him I could do just fine, in a far less toxic environment and not have to spent time to correct factual errors. And I have little to no feelings about the user. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager8 May 2018, 10:06 AM Jump back to quoted post8 May 2018, 09:26 AMKatitof And put you out of work? Plus, it changes completely nothing. On field spawn cost is lower, everything else applies as it did. That simply demonstrates the fact that you talk about thing you know little about as if you are an expert. Actually very little applies of what you said: The DPS of Fall is 38-16. The unit cost 380 which is higher than some elite allied infantry and units like commandos come with reinforcement point do not need weapon upgrade. Fall camo is static you can not move with it, one need vet 2 for that. PLS stop pretending to be an expert on Fallschirmjäger and spread misinformation about them. Once more a suggestion, if you want to post about something check the facts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: idea about fallschirmjager8 May 2018, 09:19 AM Jump back to quoted post8 May 2018, 08:30 AMKatitof A unit designed to ambush is not strong in direct firefight. More shocking news at 11. And since you think they are expensive to reinforce or expensive at all compared to other elite inf, let me blow your pants off with math: They cost 440mp to call in. 80 of that mp is for on field deployment. That means actual squad costs and performs as a 360mp squad. 360/4/2 is 45 and 45 is what they should reinforce for without any 'ist cheaper, because ist axis lol', but the dicsount for being axis applies and they cost 36. There is no other squad in game that underpays as much for reinforce as falls short of vet3 REs. Now, back to the 360 price. Compared to literally ANY other allied elite infantry, ist SUPER CHEAP, because ALL allied elite infantry costs more or requires at the very least additional 75 muni upgrade to perform well. Their DPS is 44 at close range and ~16 at far range, that means while they do not Excel at any range, they have enough DPS to cost efficiently engage ALL squads in game at range other squad would be disadvantaged at. You fight cons or rifles? Open with long range. You fight guards? Or tommies? Open at close range and force them to move with nades. Why you can open when you want? Because you have camo that allows you to move, therefore if you do not suck donkey balls at the game, YOU are the one who can pick fights with falls. In short, specifically for you: Suggestion, try using a unit in the current patch or reading the patch notes before posting about them. Fallschirmjäger Fallschirmjager are being adjusted to have better stock performance with only minor changes to their veterancy. Now paradrop into the field instead of infiltrating. Cost from 440 to 380 Reinforce cost from 38 to 36 Population from 8 to 9 Received accuracy from 0.87 to 0.83 Faust range from 15 to 18 Camouflages in cover when stationary; requires no veterancy Veterancy 5 range bonus removed Veterancy 3 received accuracy bonus removed Veterancy 4 accuracy bonus moved to veterancy 3 Veterancy 3 now provides a -20% weapon cooldown Veterancy requirements from 760/1520/3040/3800/5054 to 600/1200/2400/3000/3900 In: COH2 Balance