stop muddling the water with sudden tangential argument.
Pls stop telling me what to do. If you want to ask something of me use pls.
we were discussing the usage of long range recon with off map nuke to instantly delete on board howitzer anywhere on the map. The british artillery doctrine lacked both the long range recon + off map to do this. This is called context.
And what you wrote was that R.A. does not a have reckon and Off map. Both claims where and remain incarcerate, deal with it and move on.
Similarly just claiming british have recon+offmap is missing the entire fact that it can't be used on a rearline howtizer. This is called context. Stop taking quote out of context just to win an argument.
I am not trying to win an argument I simply pointed out that what you wrote is inaccurate.
In addition if your context is whether this commander can or can not counter static artillery pieces it can (but not hard counter them as stuka/reckon can). Actually it counter them better than some other UKF commanders.
Let's agree that British have what's technically Recon + off map, but it has a limit on effective range and thus can't be used on the rearline.
That was my point in the first place. I did not claim anything else. Glad that we can agree now we can move on.
The british's other recons also have range limition. This include the one in engineer (command vehicle), and the other in support (command building). Almost as if the Relic is avoiding the issue being able to look anywhere on the map and call down nuke.
The concentration barrage isn't even powerful enough to consistently nuke howitzer the way IL2 can. The 25 pdr is affected by sandbag and inaccurate without sight.
Well the UKF have some very strong Off map and have I to guess Relic wanted to balance them out with limiting their off map reckon abilities (thy still get very good in map spotting). Although the Commando officer, "assault" and crocodile call in provide off map reckon.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
Heartless Jäger 
