Profile of Jagdfalke

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 33

General Information


Thread: Ostheer (Wehrmacht) Grenadiers 17 Nov 2015, 12:09 PM The problem is Rifles, not grens. At the moment Rifles destroy everything. As Australian Magic already mentioned, the way to fix this is to reduce their received accuracy and make them more vulnerable out of cover. This solves the roaming terminator blob destroying everything in its path with A move. In fact this would be a better game if being out of cover was move heavily punished and would solve blobbing all together. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: King Tiger 13 Nov 2015, 00:23 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 23:55 PMNuclear Arbitor double post We can argue all day but ultimately not agree because you seem to be a fan of the British and I find them frustrating to play against. Backing your arguments up with meaningless hyperbole doesn't make them stronger though. Sure I could have mines but it requires the Churchill to drive on them. I always have at least 2 AT guns but the Churchill hp pool means it can drive up to them and grenade without repercussion and survive. Anyway the KT - often not worth it in 2v2 and under unless the game is practically already won, as it can be kited all day. Slight speed/range buff would be nice In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 12 Nov 2015, 23:40 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 23:29 PM__deleted__ Stop the whine about the churchills, they were more heavily armored than a Tiger They'd probably be fine if grenade was removed. The ability to counter their counter is just poor design. Also the croc is still ridiculous and definitely still does more flame damage than the Hetzer, despite flame damage apparently bring "normalised". No other faction can be so frivolous without fear of punishment with their armour In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 12 Nov 2015, 23:28 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 23:16 PMNuclear Arbitor except that the chruchill is not a medium tank, it's a heavy tank. also, the JT counters the churchill hard A heavy tank, that is the price of a medium tank and requires a doctrine to counter. Great. In: Lobby
Thread: Axis team game strategy10 Nov 2015, 22:04 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 13:26 PMElSlayer When I play Soviets and find out that Wehrmacht opponent invested into StuG(s) I feel relief. It means that I don't have to worry about AI vehicles any time soon and deal with those pesky StuGs later using SU-85, which just outrange them. "invest" - a stug is 90 fuel. Teching to t4 for an su85 is much more of an investment In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 10:43 AMKatitof Sure it does. Its a tank destroyer using ZiS-3 gun and having ZiS-3 penetration. You have to agree that SU-76 is too good for its cost though. There's no incentive to build SU-85 at all when you can just sit on SU-76s (which are also way easier to vet up). SU-76 should be a medium tank destroyer and SU-85 the heavy tank destroyer. In: Lobby
Thread: Axis team game strategy10 Nov 2015, 11:36 AM STUG meta. Seriously, get one as soon as you can and sit it back from your infantry a bit. It pays dividends all game (I usually go for 2 now). Just ignore OKW until they get rebalanced. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Centaur3 Nov 2015, 10:46 AM the centaur is still miles better than the ostwind In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CieZ's State of CoH 2 - November 1, 20152 Nov 2015, 14:00 PM Even if just one of these things were implemented, the change to weapons upgrades would shake the game up a fair bit and keep things fresh In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Op.... really?1 Nov 2015, 03:01 AM Holy thread-necro In: COH2 Balance