Profile of Darc Reaver

Or just reverte it to 1.0 version when it used to kill like 2-3 guys in a direct hit.

And then you have a StuG IV with HE shells. That's exactly how the StuH should not look anymore. It's got a 105mm Howitzer mounted on its chassis, not a 75mm HE shell pzIV gun.

Oh and it feels like its having a hard time vs airbornes, no more nuke shots.

That's what my proposed stat changes will result in. Slower, but more accurate "nuke" shots but less squad wipes unless your opponent blobs.

But even if your video card can produce 100 FPS, if your monitor can only do 60FPS then that is all you will get, plus tearing which is annoying. Then add on performance penalties for vsync etc and you have overall a less smooth experience on a 60Hz screen. Yes Hz originated from CRT monitors, but the concept hasent changed. You'll still see smoother gameplay if you have a high end card + higher refresh monitor.

Still, I don't see how a so called "60Hz" screen would be undecent at showing games/movies/whatever. Simply because there's no noticeable effect if you play with 40, 50 or 100 fps. The only situation where this helps is during phases of intensed action where thosee 40 fps rigs fall below 30fps for short periods of time. The human eye can only dissolve 30 fps, everything above is just luxury mostly afaik. Of course, if you remove the frame lock a game will run faster (like double speed, or triple speed or even more, depending on the fps your rig generates), and this might look like it's running faster/smoother. But that's for different reasons..

From my knowledge blurring and stuff that disturbs the screen quality usually occurs when the screen black-white transition times are too high, resulting in parts of the screen having lower quality opposed to situations with low screen activity, which isn't really connected to vsync.

I do think that this "120 Hz" hype is just that - hyping something largely useless to warrant more sales. Just like the first screens with black-white transition times of 11ms or less, which in reality had worse values than 25+ ms screens because of unrealisitc testing settings. Of course they were advertised especially for FPS gamers who liked UT or racing games, although they were garbage.

Afterall, (usually) new hardware will always outperform old hardware, because it's (usually) technologically advanced. For screens it's less energy consumption, better contrast, better transition times, better color saturation etc. And of course if your old screen is like 2 years old you'll notice that the new one will have a better graphic quality, but that's because it's new, not because it has 120hz or whatever salesmen are trying to crap into your head..

However, I'm no expert on this area, so I may be wrong on this.

I had a 60hz screen and now vs the Benq.... its a BIG difference... but I also have the graphics card to keep up..

http://www.testufo.com/#test=framerates

You know that fps is NOT hz, right?
30 fps means that your GFX cards sends 30 pictures per second to your screen.
60 fps means that the GFX sends 60 pictures per second to your screen.

Everything below 30 is noticed as flickering/bad performance/lagging.
Everything above 30 isn't really noticeable UNLESS you have extremely high moving actions on the screen.

Both has nothing to do with Hz rates from screens.

Again: Hz = Hertz = frequency = cathode ray tube value how often it refreshes old CRT monitors. Hertz is only important for CRT screens. These ones that were used 10 years ago:


fps = frames per second = value that determines your GFX/CPU performance ingame.

Talking about revitalizing a game that's on the market for 7 months... are you kidding me?

I tried something similar (with more AoE accuracy slightly less damage) but it raped too much so I further lowered the AoE short. Which I came out on version 2 of the remake.

The 1 second extra reload too make up for more damage is interesting though. Could play some more with that.

That's the point of bringing in a StuH... It's a 105mm artillerypiece mounted on a StuG chassis. It's anti inf and anti blob. So it should rape blobbed infantry. That's what its howitzer is made for. If it does not do that it's worthless. Just imagine a 105mm offmap barrage not killing grens on a direct hit - everyone would go like "lol wtf is this. They got hit by arty, they should be dead".