Profile of mortiferum

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 571

General Information


Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 11:43 AMEsxile Post the replay cuz its hardly difficult to believe. I don't have replay. Did not save it, only wanted to bring it up as a discussion topic. I have had shitty luck thus far, and some "obvious" wins turned into total wtf moments...... (ass gren losing to IS point blank, etc) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guards AT-rifles22 Aug 2016, 11:16 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 11:12 AMAustralian Magic To be honest, no one cared about dropped PTRSes for over 2 years In fact, you were happy when Guard squad lost PTRS For some reason, I am imagining a guard squad with 2 dropped PTRS, and using 4 LMG-34..... THE NEW META! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 10:53 AM My point did not change. Charging 2 MG from the front with a dense blob should be punished by suppression/ pin. Using flanking, or spreading forces out should be encouraged, not have them as dense as possible, especially with late game LMG "blobs" which can sniper gunners out even while MG is in green cover. They pushed back the Ostwind while suppressed as well. There were 2 MG, an Ostwind, and a P4. The "blob" was suppressed. Neither the P-4 nor the ostwind caused sufficient casualties before Ostwind was pushed back by AT rifle guards (which were suppressed). PS: Ostwind was not lost, but also embarrassingly ineffective against something it should counter, infantry. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 10:18 AM You are right, defining a blob and turning it into useful code will be hard since relic.... yeah, 2 squads would get counted as blobbing... Would increasing the MG's suppression radius work? Since the issue here are that MG seems to be unable to suppress more than 1-2 unit at a time even if they are clumped up rather close to each other from time to time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 08:36 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 07:05 AMEsxile Not really, but it proves you don't have a single clue either. Be glad and find me a definition with valid numbers instead of a trollpic. No longer have replay, but would you consider 7 squads of guards, all standing so close that unit cards essentially overlap each other and having little space in between as "blob"? I thought you were the troll, since I mentioned the numbers before. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 06:52 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 06:50 AMEsxile What's a blob anyway? Does this help you imagine what a blob looks like? xD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 06:28 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 06:03 AMzerocoh are you stupid? OKW have the best mortar in the game. Also, start using the flaktrack against blobs, It's doing wonders for me. Not stupid, but pretty sure LeIG is not the best... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 00:00 AMskemshead If they were suppressed then drive your tank over them. He will either retreat or take massive losses. Don't just sit a vehicle in front of an AT blob and expect to come out in front. I also agree that mgs could suppress somewhat quicker in regard to blobs. ( Not spread out units moving at the edges of the firing arc ) Ostwind was the thing that tried to drive over said guard blob, even while suppressed they still move away in time from crush and the AT rifles were... at rifles. My main gripe is still how the units weren't punished more by the MG if they move headlong into it. Either way, I raised a point, and I am not going to argue with anyone. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Idea: OKW - The second Ostheer21 Aug 2016, 13:26 PM I did not buy OKW, to play Ostheer v2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: (2v2) OKW vs UK/ USSR 21 Aug 2016, 10:15 AM Just going to bump it a little since it seems like no one seen it. In: Replay Reviews