Profile of Lady Xenarra

Comets criss-crossing the map at F1 speeds, eating everything on their way? Emplacements bringing back CoH:ToV British Sim City PTSD? Volk Schreck blobs descending on everything like a locust swarm, in the spirit of vCoH Recoilless Para blobs? 2+ ISU 152s from a single player in a match evaporating everything on two legs? Planes incinerating entire armies on crashing? Uncounterable Soviet snipers in clown cars?

We are in a heaven of balance compared to where we used to be.

Not going to lie, I do miss the schreckblobs and volks having even more reduced received accuracy at vet V. But they did have to go, too powerful.

Yes flank the position. Make a wide arc around it and attack softer targets behind the Bofors like a mortar pit for example. With them gone, the Bofors itself can be eliminated very easily. But hey, you aren't even listening to me. I'm just wrong whatever I say, according to some people here. I could claim that an orange is orange and someone here would dispute that.

I'm done with this discussion.

LoL, you're not even ranked. Everything you said is LITERALLY WRONG. Please don't comment until you can do better than a comp stomp.

Personally, I find 1v1 either boring and highly predictable or extremely fast paced affairs, which is why I don't do them anymore.

The logic in your post is as follows: Read player card. Ignore the Hidden status (meaning no played in weeks in that mode) of the 1v1s, and say that means unranked and that the player only does comp stomp. Also ignores the clearly ranked games in 4v4 or 2v2 AT against players. Fails to attack my argument except to say 'you're wrong' or repeat unsubstantiated claims with no reasoning behind them. But I'm wasting my breath here, and should know better than to post in the 'Balance section' of any game's forum(s).

Back on topic: There is no position on a map where a Bofors can be, that cannot be simply avoided or flanked. If it is absolutely impossible to take out the emplacements for whatever reason.......attack everywhere but the emplacement section. Classic Art of War stuff for those who have heard of it. Screaming that a heavily entrenched defense is hard to beat is just as bad as players I've been with where we've pinned the enemy into 1/3 of the map and they keep rushing dual cancer commander + SU/US on Hamburg port. We gave up on using mortars and ISGs 5-6 mins into the match. In that match I managed to convince my team to slow down, and work methodically. Doesn't matter if they have 2 vps, we would slowly and surely breakthrough. Between the Jagdtiger, KT, mobile rocket artillery, artillery call-ins and superior late game units the pressure was too much even for dual cancer commanders. For the record, they had 6-8 mortar pits, 3+ bofors, Goddess knows how many fwd emplacements and 2-3 17 pounders. And then there was the SU/US forces making a forward attack suicidal. And yet we beat all of that.

And people say that I'm an OKW fanboi.....

A lone bofors is easily beaten by a barraging ISG, which fires well outside the Bofors barrage range. For more complex defenses (2 x mortar pits + bofors + fwd hq) these take time to pt up. For OKW ISGs with some micro can shut this down as long as you act early. Yes cancer commander will beat you, but after the May patch CB becomes much less of an issue. OST have mortars in T1 and flame half track in T2. The lattr will melt through your typical emplacement spammer as they will have spent all their resources on....emplacements and not on AT. If you can't work around the Bofors that's your own fault.

This whole thing is much ado about nothing once more.

Steam Alias: Lady Xenarra
Steam ID #:76561198059170410