Profile of GreenDevil

What's the highest number of CP's you have ever finished with in a automatch, 1 2's 3's or 4's?

I said thousands times this stick to cover bullshit just causing trouble.

- Making capping unit stepping out of the circle
- Making squad like maxim crew hugging together asking for riflenade
- Squadwipe™, Squadwipe™, Squadwipe™, going to cover = asking for Squadwipe™

For the love of God, rewrite the goddamn algorithm or just remove it.

+1 This. Couldn't have said it better myself.

Hey dude.

I know why you lost and it was for a number of reasons.

1. You made a bad teching decision. You teched T2 and then went straight for T4 on a map that has little fuel income. That was always going to end badly. T3 is the tech of choice on that map, P4's backed by Paks, Shreked PGrens and normal Grens with LMG.

2. Your team mate JellyD0nut was at one stage floating 1700mp and he did not tech past T2. If he spent some of that manpower putting down fuel OP's you would of been in a great position. Especially as he wanted to stall for a Tiger and you went T4 for Panthers.

3. You and JellyD0nut blobbed far too much. When your opponents get blob counters like the Pack Howitzer and Motor Carriage, you really need to spread out your units. You were both bleeding constant man power due to that.

4. Your commander choice was poor. On that map consider Luftwaffe Supply Doctrine and base your strategy around completely locking down the fuel and all of the territory on your side of the frozen river. Litter it with mines, bunkers, MG's Grens, Mortars and then just constantly drop fuel drops into the fuel point. This guarentees you a win if you manage to hold on to the fuel, something that should be quite easy if you both work together. You certainly had the opportunity to do so early.

5. Work as team. You did not work as a team early in the game, when it matters. Jelly should of pushed up with you and locked down your side of the river instead of trying to fight his own proxy war in the enemies territory. The key to Ostheer early vs USF in 2v2 is to stick close togther, lure him in to area where you want to fight him, don't go where he wants to fight you.

6. JellyD0dunts teching was also very poor. As said earlier, he did not tech past T2 and then floated 1700mp. If he had teched T3 as well as you, you both could of had P4's and pushed out to gain back ground. You had the counters for Jackson. Shreks and Paks.

Hope this helps.

If you want to compare with idiots using the FHQ, you are completely right.

Good luck vs FHQ with:

1) Good oppenents coordinated to spam 3 Soviet mortars at once
2) A hell of Cons sandbag and wire around the FHQ
3) Good choice of buildings that impossible to go down instantly even against MHT and Stuka, e.g. Train station, big French church, big French buildings
4) FHQ for total denial of muni and fuel of Axis

If you claim FHQ is easy to counter in big teamgames, either they are nubs or just Allies fanboy propaganda.

In a nut-shell, this is spot on. On maps especially Trospoints FHQ is impossible to counter, espically in 2v2, where one player makes 2 FHQ and the other techs.

That's called encirclement. Flanking is well....attacking from the flanks....there are two flanks.

Dude, you are being too literal. Just because flanking means attacking your opponent from the sides, doesn't mean you have to attack them from the same direction on that side.

You can flank your opponent if he is facing North, from the North East, East, South East, North West and West. There's five directions just there on both flanks. It is a lot harder to turn and face an MG to an incoming flank if the squads are approaching from the directions as described. If they are all approaching from due East or Due West then its quite easy to just turn and face the MG that way.

Am I making sense or do I have to break it down some more?