Profile of aerafield

Avatar Area

Offline Germany
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3

General Information
Steam: 76561198062101687
Residence:

Germany
Nationality:

Germany
Timezone: Europe/Berlin
Game Name: [NS] aerafield

Show Latest Posts

Thread: Surrender vote is broken23 Aug 2021, 12:08 PM

And look at the bright side:

At least this did not happen to you

In: COH2 Gameplay

Thread: Surrender vote is broken23 Aug 2021, 11:23 AM

After 30 minutes or so, only 2 votes in 3v3 (and 3 in 4v4) are required to surrender the match. It is dumb yeah but intended by Relic and won't be changed at this point.

In: COH2 Gameplay

Thread: Ladder ranking, player features22 Aug 2021, 17:29 PM

22 Aug 2021, 17:12 PMpornoke

Hi to all.

Could anybody write the main differences of a 1v1 player depending on his ladder ranking?

For example:

>2000: they lack the basics of unit preservation, using cover, pick up fights and combined arms.

>1500 <1999: they know the basics and start to play well, but fail because of the lack of speed or knwoledge...

>1000 <1499: they play decently and control the basics but they lack of adaptation and ...

>500 <999: they play well enough but usually have lack of speed, experience, cold blood or patience

>100 <499: they are very very good at the game but they lack of ...

>50 <99: they are top players and play perfectly with absolute control of everything. They only lack ...

>10 <49: they know how to put the RNG Gods on their side but they only lack ...

1 <9: they are the best players in the world and they know how to put the RNG Gods and even Goddess on their side so we can only learn how to play watching at them on Twitch (we can also do watching a top 500 player ).

I'm a 900 ranking right now and I have gone through a hard way to achieve it. I still learn a lot in each match, especially when I lose. Most of the time I lose I can see what I did wrong, so I can see more learning room, but I think that diagram could help us to improve and find our weak points. The better we all play, the funniest matches we'll have.

Kisses!

Honestly I would say your ladder here is 99% accurate already. In the 500-100 cell I would simply change the boundary from 100 to 50, so it becomes 500-50.

500-50: ... but they lack of a fast enough micro speed (hence losing units too easy) and don't use maximum tryhard meta army compositions (build orders)

10-50: ... they only lack the last tiny bit of perfection and sharpness when it comes to unit preservation and unit positioning, but they are still capable of beating the top 10

In: Lobby

Thread: Vote on New OKW SpecOps Portrait!21 Aug 2021, 10:46 AM

Both look good but I slightly prefer the first one

In: Lobby

Thread: Are rangers overpriced?21 Aug 2021, 10:43 AM

21 Aug 2021, 10:27 AMSupremeStefan

Why people always bring that argument ? Panzergarandier and werfer spam is way more potent, cheaper and available without doc.

Panzergren spam (with schrecks) is only viable in the 4-digit ranks

In: COH2 Balance

Thread: Are rangers overpriced?20 Aug 2021, 13:10 PM

Rangers are fine. Thompson Rangers are strong enough, and 3x bazooka Rangers with calliope is already a common cheese strat

In: COH2 Balance

Thread: CoH2 Summer 2021 Balance Patch - BETA15 Aug 2021, 14:20 PM

13 Aug 2021, 12:34 PMKatukov

I'm more annoyed that the sturmtiger can be made with a king tiger, try diving both of those things at the same time...

No need to dive them when your opponent spent 1300 manpower and 430 fuel on two tanks that are totally defenseless from frontal attacks by Tank Destroyers

In: Lobby

Thread: how to maxim ?!?!????!?!?!?!?!?!?! (3v3)11 Aug 2021, 12:00 PM

Spray & Pray bulletin is next to useless yes.

4% rate of fire and double +10% veterancy bulletins is the best bulletin combo

In: COH2 Gameplay

Thread: SU-76 buff? 11 Aug 2021, 01:06 AM

11 Aug 2021, 00:21 AMKatukov

the stug is 15 fuel more expensive, but inherits full pak-40 stats at vet 0. The su-76 gets less penetration and damage than the zis-3 does, veterancy doesn't make up for it entirely, either. Maybe i should just let it go and make 2 su-85s instead, who knows

SU-76 has 60 meters weapon range, same like AT guns and allies tank destroyers. That is its big selling point for such a cheap tank. The StuG has only 50 range.

The damage is lower(120 stock, 140 at vet 2), yes, but if it had the full 160 damage, it would legit be busted OP for the price

In: COH2 Balance

Thread: SU-76 buff? 10 Aug 2021, 23:13 PM

10 Aug 2021, 22:37 PMKatukov

I have seen several instances of the su-76 in both my games and in that of other people by now. I got to say that it is a pretty underwhelming vehicle, confirming my previous beliefs on it.

It lacks dps and durability, even the range aside, the stug completely destroys this machine (and can straight up rush into it). In conclusion, you delay t-4 and a t-70, all for a low damage cannon. Not worth getting.

I use the SU-76 regularly, and I think it complements perfectly with t1 penal builds. In games where you are kinda low on fuel, you can slowly but surely get multiple SU-76, and I think they are devastating in groups of 3-4 because then you have a "tank blob" that will effectively trade in most fights, because if the enemy attacks you and loses a tank, usually you will not lose more than one SU76.

If fuel income is good, however, I would just tech straight for T34 and SU85 of course. Or get one only so enemy p4 rush doesnt push you off the map

In: COH2 Balance