Profile of aerafield

And the unranked wehrmacht player was rank 100

Yes, this is very bad, yesterday I destroyed Brummbar for a few minutes by shooting his engine. This is ridiculous. Another aspect that I don't like about E8 is the additional infantry unit that comes with it. I don't need him, like the captain and other unnecessary units.

pretty much, the riflemen squad makes this call in completely overpriced. And it doesnt help that the combat stats of the E8 suck as well. It has same weapon range and damage like a normal sherman, and only 60 more HP
(860 vs 800)

you need to pick the Brad Pitt upgrade

wrong game

Sage used Findeed name for ages and even talked alot of bm while doing so.

... and got permabanned multiple times on different accounts for it in the end. See entry #4 : https://www.coh2.org/topic/52964/list-of-players-suspended-banned-by-relic/post/725206


About the grey areas and vague rules, I agree with all of you basically. But one thing is pretty certain: You cannot get banned just for copying a Steam name unless it's Relic Staff name. There needs to be additional abusive behavior, in a way so that the person is clearly attempting to damage the reputation of the name that they duplicated.


Now in Kimbo's case, only Relic knows the exact reason. But there is multiple possible scenarios, such as:

- playing arranged team with a seeking smurf while using Luvnest's name was interpreted as attempted reputation damage

- the whole player impersonation as reason was just a "placeholder" for a different reason such as playing with a cheater

- etc.

OK i show you one of my smurfs banned from back in the day, just because im a nice guy.

Ok so one of my assumptions might be wrong, cool. But it really doesn't matter. We're arguing about something that isn't the core of the topic.

Relic doesn't have to tell you the exact details about the ban. You were walking on thin ice when you decided to change your name while playing with Seeking, and you knew that. Not to mention that there might be ban-worthy incidents that we don't know about because it happened off-stream.

It's not our business, so what is even the point of this thread other than you throwing a tantrum *again* after being timebanned for what feels like the 3rd or 4th time now (congrats, that is quite an achievement Kimbo)

Now I am not responsible for the bans (and the person who is has NDA), so I am mostly restricted to my assumptions, but I am 95% confident they are accurate.

I am pretty sure that this ingame information about the ban is from a pool of pre-written texts that Relic can choose, and I think "playing with a banned cheater's smurf" is not available in that pool

This Luvnest impersonation was probably 5% of the reason for the ban, so they picked it. If it was even more than these 2 reasons, no idea. I would say "ask Relic" now but to my knowledge, a game developer is not forced to give you the exact reason(s) for a multiplayer suspension *shrug*

I have a little question for you to use your brain my friend, use it sometimes.

you guys have issues with using logical thinking, no offense.

It's really funny that this is coming from you, because that were my thoughts when you decided to team up with a Seeking smurf and even stream it on Twitch. Then play victim afterwards and tunnel vision on the "player impersonation" as the only reason for the ban.

Wtf were you thinking was gonna happen, especially after what you saw in the Inca 4v4 cup two months ago. You are lucky if they don't ban you from Master League for a long time.