Profile of Jiisharo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5

General Information


Thread: OKW in the New Patch: Roman go the house!29 Jul 2015, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2015, 20:02 PMBeefSurge Therefore...USF UP. Therefore USF Stuart OP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New usf meta strategies 26 Jul 2015, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 18:34 PMGluhoman Mostly I have problems with folks blobberino, supporting with falls or fusiliers. That sounds like a LOT of infantry, have you tried using the pak howitzer? I had lots of issues vs blobs playing as OKW until I learned to correctly use the infantry support gun (i.e. not like a mortar, needs direct line of fire). It provides AOE suppression + dmg and is quite precise when not firing indirectly, helped a lot. The MP bleed should let you field vehicles + infantry while your opponent cannot reinforce + pay MP for tanks. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Teching analysis and faction comparison re July 21 patch19 Jul 2015, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2015, 09:48 AMIron Emperor Sounds like Axis will be even more on the defensive and Allies offensive? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching analysis and faction comparison re July 21 patch19 Jul 2015, 09:00 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2015, 14:25 PMJunaid The devs have intended that okw needs any 2 tiers to get a well rounded army so T1+T2 is ok too so you are absolutelycorrect on that count. T1+T2 does have the disadvantage of no tanks of any kind only jpiv which is not a tank. Plus i deliberately didnt write it down because (a) from what ive seen almost every okw players goes T3 (b) keep the reference above simple and easy to understand and ward off misunderstandings from guys saying OKW 'merely' needs 60 fuel for accessing medium armor. Infact imma edit the main post now that this has occurred to me True that T3 is built after T1 or T2 in the vast majority of OKW games I've seen. I often build the 3 tiers, somehow my 1v1s as OKW tends to last 40min+ as I'm just fighting to get a hold on a fuel point most of the time. I guess we'll see how it plays out. I do like the possibility for allies to make early light vehicles rush. It was common in vCOH to see a very early Stuart racking up kills, denying areas with mines, being annoying as hell, etc. I still build early AT as axis because of those memories. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teching analysis and faction comparison re July 21 patch18 Jul 2015, 14:06 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2015, 12:57 PMJunaid OKW Intended: T1 or T2>T3 From a 1v1 (and ~2v2) perspective I've the impression that the OKW intended build is T1 > T2 or T3. First because T1 ISG and IR Halftrack does not require fuel and also because T2 into T3 is so fuel consuming. If you get just one FlakHT, one puma and one stuka out from T2 it's already 215 fuel. Unless you're sitting on 2 fuel points / don't need T1 to secure 1 fuel point (in which case you're probably winning already) it seems you won't get anything out of T3 before a long time.. If you were not going to get units out of T2 to use fuel for T3 then why not get T1 in the first place? I'm even more convinced of this with the upcoming decrease cost of Ie.IG 18 ISG and previous decrease on the IR halftrack. Decreased reinforced cost for Sturmpios will let you get more than 1 squad (2 maybe 3 total) so can skip T2 and still repair efficiently. Relic seems to promote for more use of T1. In: COH2 Balance