Profile of JibberJabberJobber

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 12:24 PMHannibal

Indeed, the good measurement accurary on the pen chances suggests that the real miss and scatter-hit chances are fairly accurate as well.
While the test will always work out in favor of the Churchill (since StuG always hits), I did not think that it would be that severe, especially since the StuGs model is not that big.

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 11:16 AMHannibal

I thibk it should be clear that the theoretical calculation does not account for scatter and is therefore somewhat flawed, but it is a way better and more comparable model thean just crying 'XYZ OP!'.

Testing is better if you have a sufficient sample size, and the theoretical calculation can give you an idea of how big your sample size needs to be to get reliable results.

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 10:47 AMAlphrum

like how you just casually ignore this. You cant just read some statistics and expect it to be identical ingame.

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 07:10 AMHannibal

Some clarification: 13 shots corrected for accuracy and pen chance at the units max range.
Stug only needs 4 shots to die, but Churchill has horrible accuracy against a Stug and will miss at least half of its shots, while Stug will always hit the Churchill.