Some players reminisce about CoH1 like Noun talks about pizza toppings. It is their passion and very few people understand their feelings and concerns . |
im not whining, just saying there's good in this game that people should focus on
also your 171 posts aren't intimidating
I was not suggesting that I post on a regular basis myself, but then again, I am not the one whining about people whining on a forum.
A minority of the people do focus on "the good in the game" by actually playing the game. |
And a nitpick. Governments perform censorship, private actors can treat their property as they like.
Counter nitpick. Private actors perform censorships just as well as sovereign entities, as the motivation does not have to be of ethical/moral nature. But even then, the suggestion that all private actors are self-centered regarding their property is highly incorrect.
Sorry, could not resist . |
Opponent of rank 4563 was 145 or whatever. Suggestion was that person who goes and has rant on various forums about balance, most of the time doesn't have a clue what his opponents rank was.
P.S. If I am not wrong, you could see your true rank in COH as well. If you go into leaderboars, it will tell you you are 853 or 4567 ranked player (albeit, only for ranked matches). Display rank was 1-20
This particular person has all the means to find the absolute rank of his opponent before he rants on forums. The suggestion was aimed at the classic ranking system (20-1), whereas I argued why it should display an absolute rank (1-420.000).
CoH1 has silimar means through the search player ability, although the absolute rank combined with a steam profile gives more information. |
1. Disagreed. Absolute rankings (1-420.000) are a more accurate way to obtain knowledge about the true skill level of an opponent. Your example is flawed as you did not mention the rank of the opponent of "player ranked 4563". The aftermath varies between an "opponent ranked 145" and an "opponent ranked 4564", for instance.
2. Disagreed. Steam is a great way to add new friends and chat, while there is no necessity to even be ingame. Next to that, there is no chat lobby harassement.
3. Agreed. This is where balancing is for. |
What about the utility that you get out of ipad vs Commanders compared to their cost?
Not to mention what a product means to you?
You mate, need to learn some common sense, it will do you good
Ideally, the price and the value are the same. However, price and value are two very different concepts. Regarding these new comanders, the price and value will converge over time. |
So you whine on a forum about players that whine on a forum, which you barely post on? |
One cannot claim the new commanders are overpriced yet, as the sales figures of these commanders are not known yet. The demand determines the true price of these tactical additions.
Furthermore, current owners of CoH2 have shown they are willing to pay a premium price for the game itself, so Relic's assumption they would be willing to pay the same for additional content is probably correct. |
I suppose you are right. Hopefully people will give voice to my request, because there is just too much material in this thread to fill one signature!! |
I noticed I am no longer the only one who adds legendary Nullist quotes to their signature. Join me in my quest, this thread is gold! |