I have to interject on Riddler's behalf, just because your post is screaming some kind of denial.
1. One can only judge ideas, as far as one can comprehend them being expressed. The use of simplistic memes to raise an issue, memes that are over used (get the idea out of the room and kill it with fire - seen this one more times than I can count already, and only been on the forums for 2 hours) is something that draws question as to the depth of the argument.
2. Repeat this in English, I can't wrap my head around what you're trying to say.
denial ??? Oh yeah i forgot the internet is full of supergeniuses who can detect denial and other traits by reading one post .
First of all i am longer in this forum than you and i dont really recall reading that certain phrase that many times unless you r only able to count your fingers .
Anyway to tackle your so called argument , you might have failed to notice it but Tommy has written a big text , the phrase you mentioned along with a few others is initially there to make reading the text easier , whats more its his personal opinion that is how he sees it and the bad thing is that he isnt wrong saying get the idea out of the room and kill it with a crossbow or whatever . Furthermore what you are actually doing is so faulty by all means of logic , i say this because tommy has written a big text with well thought and constructive criticism and you are judging it (the ideas ) by a few phrases which are there to bring the humorous element and which are not arguments or observed facts . Riddler went a step further and said that the critisism would be deemed by relic as not serious if you r using such phrases , right , and the fact that the OP took considerable time to write it and most of the dedicated players aggree with him suggests the opposit and if relic doesnt pay attention (which is not likely ) then so be it , it ll be on them not us .
2 you might want to read the text i am quoting in my first post because its a question , you normally cant comprehend a question of that sort unless you know the initial statement .
You might think i am obnoxious but i think you r a troll
Multiple commanders (>3) partially replace CoH1 commander tree-side decisions, especially when commanders are somewhat similar. Increasing the number of commanders creates more strategic opportunities. This resembles the CoH1 tree-side decision
Not really since you can take only 3 of them at a time and the changes they account for are not that big anyway whats more for germans doctrines have a very small impact on gameplay while for russians you loose whatever strategical advantage you may have since its almost mandatory to use your doctrines early on and even then with linearity of the progression and the lack of impact commanders have it still falls sort of replacing the old system . Granted that they could change it by adding more influencial abilities but they would need to change the whole philosophy behind the new system and i find that highly unlikely .
Otherwise you could potentially create a bigger problem than the one you want to fix despite your good intentions .
0
Ignatius J. Reilly
ringhost1
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
