Profile of BeltFedWombat

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United Kingdom
Posts: 951

General Information
Email: znqrhcrznvy(upc)farnxlznvy.bet
Register Time: 4 Feb 2013, 18:44 PM
Twitter: @AirfixPanzer
Residence:

United Kingdom
Nationality:

United Kingdom
Timezone: Europe/London
Game Name: AirfixPanzer

Show Latest Posts


Thread: PSA about UKF alpha21 Apr 2015, 17:03 PM I'm number 1. Still won't get in the alpha. In: Lobby
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?20 Apr 2015, 18:41 PM Rommel doctrine - get saddled with Italians, fall out with the boss when you realise you've backed the wrong horse, spend a year or two supervising wall-building then commit suicide. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?20 Apr 2015, 18:13 PM Flame (Bren) carrier spam FTW In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Feedback requested] - balancing issues in large team games18 Apr 2015, 14:12 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2015, 18:58 PMIpKaiFung the maps just don't work. Every map has 14 resource sectors and 3 Vps, when you add more players the responsibility for map control reduces and it also causes resource income rates to peak out faster. Maps for the larger modes need more resource sectors and less resource per point to compensate so that the total resource count available is the same but it is distributed even further. The maps are also very big which results in full retreats being very detrimental because it takes a really long time to get back to the action zones. The maps are also very narrow which limits flanking opportunities. tl;dr maps are a bigger problem then most players realise. This. There are lots of good points in this thread, but I think a core re-design of the 3v3 / 4v4 maps as Ipkai suggests would make a massive, positive, difference. Resources = flow of game. Re-balancing the resource sectors, and even VPs (why not maps with, say, two or four?) might well achieve this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: lets make the worst patch ever16 Apr 2015, 15:47 PM 1. Kubel suppression needs a buff. 2. As do Obers... plus they should be able to shoot down planes 3. Jacksons need more range and better armour 4. Ostheer armour is too OP, especially PIV which needs a nerf 5. Oorah should give the Soviet player munitions 6. PTRS should be a combat engineer upgrade. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: (8) Lienne Forest Perspective15 Apr 2015, 14:40 PM Great work Pigsoup, would love to see more of these. In: Guides
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?13 Apr 2015, 19:24 PM Will you stat monkeys go and get a bloody room? You're destroying a reasonably interesting thread. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?11 Apr 2015, 13:28 PM ...aaaaand back to blobbing. I don't want to see any faction officer-dependant as standard. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?11 Apr 2015, 11:16 AM What would be refreshing would be an all-rounder tank like the Cromwell that was OK versus infantry and armour but not brilliant at either. With flank speed the tactic versus German heavies would be numerical superiority and micro (i.e. rear armour hits) but they'd be a bit more resilient versus shreks than a Sherman. Heavy Brit AT could be a 17 pounder like the German PAK43. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?10 Apr 2015, 18:30 PM All wore red berets, officers and men Er, claret or maroon please. Chosen by the (famous) novelist Daphne Du Maurier, wife of Maj. Gen 'Boy' Browning (architect of the Parachute Regiment in the early 40's). Browning wanted distinctive headgear for the new outfit, and trusted his wife's impeccable taste. The Red beret, in the British army, is worn by the military police. In: COH2 Gameplay