Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Idea: Mortars vs. Tank Destroyers13 Aug 2016, 19:52 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2016, 19:34 PMferwiner Also, Katitof said it is retarded mainly becouse it affects only allied tds, while in fact there are some axis vehicles that could be changed in such way, too. For example top armour of real life panther turret was so thin it could easily be penetrated by mortar shell. Other examples are LVs like 222 and 251. Isn't that an good example why it shouldn't happen if it were applied with realistic logic? 222 and 251 are already damaged by mortars and they'd probably be pretty guaranteed dead most of the time from suffering a sudden random stun. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Test! 45mm ATG, Sd.Kfz 222, andISG performance13 Aug 2016, 03:33 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2016, 01:36 AMFiresparks fixing the 45mm is pretty low priority. Yes, the 45mm is crap, but the soviet isn't really in need of a good atg or a 60 meters infantry sniper. they already have decent mg, mortar, and atg to begin with. I can see buffing the 45mm to a decent pure atg as a boost to special rifle building. Some sort of 57mm lite. If someone wants to work on it, I ain't gonna yell "Fix pathfinding you joker" at them. Though I certainly can agree having the 45mm pay in munitions for sufficient medium AT for the Soviets is a concept that is good bit more workable compared to the old 57mm for the USF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T70 Nerf12 Aug 2016, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2016, 14:36 PMZombiFrancis Well c'mon people you all know Soviets need a few conscripts squads to cap to get that fuel, so the T70 costs 720 manpower more than you think. Obviously this means that the T70 costs 1810mp and 215fuel. Obviously. I mean seriously, everyone should already factor this in by default. Riflemen cost 1680 MP because if you're getting one you have to get six In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Test! 45mm ATG, Sd.Kfz 222, andISG performance12 Aug 2016, 14:05 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2016, 13:41 PMsuuuhdude More long range anti infantry for allies. Funny how allies have so many superb long range units. AI and AT. Even though the germans were always the long range combatants if ww2. So you regard keeping the 45mm ATG shit as an important priority? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions11 Aug 2016, 15:12 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2016, 13:17 PMvietnamabc Axis trenches need to be built in captured sector so 25mp for UKF version is fine. It costs less mp than 1 IS model reinforce. Not to mention the Jerry ones are plastic by comparison, so it would certainly make sense for tougher ones to cost something. In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Warhammer 40k: Dawn of War 310 Aug 2016, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2016, 21:04 PMTheodosios I do not endorse what has unfolded in front of my eyes. Nevertheless I will persevere patiently until the final product. I HAVE A BETTER IDEA In: Other Games
Thread: Changes that I hope in the next few patches10 Aug 2016, 18:26 PM Raketens' range is already 50. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Quality of life changes for OKW9 Aug 2016, 01:17 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2016, 01:11 AMZombiFrancis Exactly. Rock, paper, scissors is pretty boring if your opponent can't play rock and you can't play paper. Arm wrestle instead then. ...I'll stop now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Raketenwerfer is awful7 Aug 2016, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2016, 20:01 PMSlyzor So you first disagree and then agree? I don't get it. They doin' this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RitaRush's FanArtFridays - Season 26 Aug 2016, 17:35 PM Nothing to add but In: The Art Studio