Profile of achpawel

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1351

General Information


Thread: Sander's personal balance changes6 Jul 2020, 14:42 PM JibberJabberJobber's and Sander's suggestions include so many quality changes that it is difficult to decide which approach is better as both as extremely good (that is moving balance in even more perfect direction). So cool to finally read some logical and reasonable suggestions. I'd use either of those as whichever ideas one implements they will be good. One thing I'm lacking here is the adjustment to ZiS gun barrage. Maybe sth like this: Soviet ZiS gun should pay munitions for each HE shot rather than for a salvo of 4. Each shot should cost e.g. 20-30 munitions. The goal would be to make it less spammable and deadly and make a Soviet player invest in mortars if they wanted indirect fire rather than build at guns. It would also require more micro and munitions if they wanted to spam such HE shots. They would be used to drain a bit of health rather than delete team weapons. ZiS is supposed to be an at gun and building it too early should be connected with a risk of lacking in anty infantry department. It could also be a reason to build su76 if a player wanted a better barrage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes6 Jul 2020, 10:26 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2020, 10:17 AMblvckdream Yes it would weaken Tommies. Tommies are too good as they are at the moment, which is why they should get some nerfs. ..from what I read their cost gets slightly increased after their are repurchased when bolstered (together with increased 5 men sappers). Maybe not enough but a good start. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes6 Jul 2020, 10:12 AM Excellent changes streamlining the game more than changing it much. TBFH I'm loving all of them and would implement them asap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 20:07 PM I'm sorry to say this. It is You who have been derailing balnance forum since times immemorial. The stats You keep quoting are absolutely cherry-picked. You ignore a simple fact that units' performance is a combination of dozens of stats and You have absolutely no clue as to how to use them. Team weapons survivability is just another example. You are completely unaware of how much difference there is between ost team weapons survivability and Your favourite Soviets. It is just insane how much you are biased and not helping the game to be actually balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 15:56 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2020, 15:43 PMKatitof Please stop mental gymnastics, you will only hurt yourself more. I wouldn't link any stats if I were U. You've proven may times that you just can't interpret them. Apparently You are only using them in order to support other allied favoring players biased opinions on how OP axis factions are. A load of crap, especially looking at tourney(s) matches. The proof is in the pudding, mate. No matter how you twist it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 15:36 PM But it is so much better to have an infantry unit to cap early game and build an mg later to support it. All armies can do that with similar results. Ost simply has to do it early game which is a drawback (yet often painted as an advantage). Stats are so complicated to many of You (including Kat) that he accuses me of not understanding them and at the same time is completely oblivious to how to interpret them! He just cherrypicks one stat and tries to persuade that because of it a unit is better than some other unit of a faction he beleives needs to be buffed. Just sad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2020, 14:41 PMKatitof Because, as you can read on this site: https://coh2db.com/stats/ They have the best stats and in their given role they all perform as #1 without contest. If you carefully check their tech, you'll also notice they have best availability of them compared only to UKF, but UKF got inferior vet abilities and stats on 2 out of 3 support units. If you really can compare multiple stats simultaneously, you will see that it is not true... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2020, 14:41 PMBaba they want their allied infantry to stomp grenadiers, thats why this is their killer argument for all approaches to making gren builds viable pretty much that - the problem is that too many people believe it and instead of l2p they keep excusuing poor skill by repeating such myths from 6-7 years ago... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team Weapons Survivability5 Jul 2020, 14:35 PM Can anybody explain why people keep repeating that ost has the best team weapons? I don't get that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1v1 map issue with Schwerer main gun range4 Jul 2020, 21:19 PM I do think that nerfing the flak gun is absolutely connected with the overall balance of the whole faction. If anyone wants to nerf the flak gun they must buff sth else. Also I find it almost hilarious how much the very easy possibility of actually destroying flak if it is placed outside base sector is downplayed. Just ridiculous imo. The whole concept of tampering with okw after all buffs to UKF, USF and Sov is just crazy imo. In: COH2 Balance