Profile of some one

A powerful T0 USF mortar was too OP, due to rifles & free officer squads. USF could use some help in the indirect fire department, but that should require some delay and locking-into (e.g., pak howitzer buffs, now that Stuart is no longer a no-brainer).

Never heard that SOviet mortar was ever OP.

4 vs 4 (3 vs 3)

I played Werhm a lot
I played OKW a lot. its a nightmare to face brits in map with concrete buildings around key positions coz of Vickers and InfSec

Now I play USF and I can say the same. USF can't do shit on maps where there are a lot of buildings. Rifles can't approach to any builing coz of Wermcht 2 HMGs and Mortars.

I don't build USF Mortar nowdays coz it tickles teammembers inside buildings. (and it cost a lot for its effect) or dies fast to counter barrage

I tryed another appproach I use smoke (from mortar) research grenade and throw them at where all models of HMG are sit. usually 2 grenade cant wipe team weapon also Nades are expensive and research cost fuel too. So it is not effective. THen Wherm rush to FlameHT or 222 which is normal. I did the same. So there very huge MP bleed and very little effectivness.


SO usually I as USF rush to U20 or AA HT or Both (but this is the preciuos time) and all that time Werhm sits on fuel point. So, soon i gonna face Pz4.

PS I felt bad when USF mortar wiped my squads left and right but I still cant understand Why USF can't have SOviet analog of mortar????

Elefant, pwerfer and dive bomb in 1v1 ? I don´t know

Mortars + Caliope + Pak Howi + fast US tanks in 1v1? I don´t know

idk What topic starter is talking about.

P47s do not provide vision more then a year...

The best example of off map infantry call in how it should be is USF Paras.