Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:44 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:41 AMThe_rEd_bEar I don't remember typing that You have spent the entire thread shitposting like a revenge porn enthusiast, lots of valuable contribution there. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:43 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:41 AMelchino7 1-Zis gun starts to move, crew gets killed, animation restarts, repeat... 2-It's not like the KT just destroy the AT gun itself and not just the crew btw. 3-AND it's not like if you move to the sides, you'll still be hitting front armor It would take several shot for even a KT to kill the 5 ZiS guns before they could move to the sides and hit the rear armor, which works like a box. The rear half of the tanks side armor counts as rear armor. You can't make the claim the KT is impossible to kill, and then as you evidence post a video of a dude refusing to micro his ZiS guns. Well at least, OKW player has to make a choice between shrek spam or Obers with LMG now. OKW cannot have it both ways where Shrek counter Armor and Obers counter infantry with ease. People are just going to move onto JLI/Panzerfuss/Fallsch spam. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:36 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:32 AMAssaultPlazma Well im not going to target anyone individually I cant help but notice that a Tiger II rolling over a mine and surviving a onslaught from 4 AT guns at point blank range is "Fine" yet an IS-2 bouncing a 1-2 Pak shells at max range is somehow broken? but I digress I never said bouncing Pak shells was broken. Just flank it! Oh lol. It's a KT with engine damage, you can walk faster than it can move. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:35 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:24 AMAssaultPlazma http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_turret The Tiger II happens to have one... as for IS-2 vs Pak40 load up cheat mod and see if you dont drive yourself crazy trying to recreate that.... And it would have it's turret not shooting at you as long if you made even the barest attempt to MOVE AROUND THE DISABLED TANK. It has engine damage, you can most faster than it. Don't sit your 5 ZiS guns in front of the most deadly tank in the game like a moron then cry when you die. Do you also sit Shermans in front of Jadgtigers or Puma's in front SU-85s? Alex will defend his Axis army no matter how retarded the facts are in front. Those AT guns exactly show how stupid KT, glad to see it's armor nerfed! So stupid that a 300+ fuel tank kills AT guns, what a travesty. Obviously this more expensive in every way tank should be on the same level as a tank which costs a fraction of what it does. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:21 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:17 AMAssaultPlazma you can clearly see it wiping them out individually, and no other tank in game can do that and frankly no tank *SHOULD BE ABLE TO SIT IN FRONT 4 AT GUNS AND COME OUT WITH HALF HEALTH* A large amount of the models are all standing on top of each other, meaning he was doing damage to several of the ZiS guns at the same time. If you stack a bunch of Volks on top of each other a single Sherman can fuck them up very fast. You can get the same effect with the IS2 versus Pak40's. The key thing here is: Don't be a retard and refuse to move your AT guns to the sides of an enemy tank to his his weaker rear armor! In: Lobby
Thread: New faction British??31 Mar 2015, 03:16 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 02:24 AMshadowwada I didn't know Relic has the same war chest as Blizzard/Activision as well as CoH2 having the same install base as SC2. Come on man You don't get to charge 40 dollars for a very short single player campaign because you don't push as many units as the best selling RTS of all time does. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:15 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 03:14 AMAssaultPlazma wow so much dick stroking....... Anyways guys about the KT armor nerf, I think that had more to do with KT simply just driving up and decrewing AT guns rather than so much as the jackson. Im sure by now most of you have seen THAT video..... Yeah the video were the dude is a total idiot and sits 5 ZiS guns stacked on top of each other so the KT can do AoE damage to them instead of moving to surround the disabled KT? In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 03:14 AM The people who are children are probably the ones who have been throwing temper tantrums asking for nerfs, and now that those nerfs have come they are just acting like a poorly disciplined child as to be expected. So glad to see OKW getting reworked, so sad to see none of the same attention paid to making Ostheer teching no garbage, USF less retardly good early game, and Soviets are just kinda left out to dry with a marginal buff to the PTRS. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 02:27 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 02:23 AMThe Silver Sage Alex I know you're dismayed but don't spread disinformation, at close range they do same damage, at mid range they will do twice as much dps as rifles and at far 3 times and that's taking into account the Nerf to lmg34. However that is not taking into account the others incoming acc bonuses. obers vs rifles 29.12 29.4 25.2145 14.18 22.51 7.28 Once again that's not accounting for obers 0.7 incoming acc. True rifles value against them are 20.58, 9.926 and 5.1. Except even if they preform the same or slightly better they are still 120 MP more expensive, when I'm getting a 4 men expensive unit that's easy to wipe I don't want to have to put up with it only being marginally better than base Rifles due to most engagements taking place at closer rangers. Not to mention the power of 1919 Rifles and 1919 Paras which wasn't touched at all. OKW deserved to having it's ability to blob reduced, the sorry fact is Relic didn't apply the same logic to USF's blob capabilities. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 02:01 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:59 AMTatatala And so it should. Still a very viable weapon, and I'll still enjoy attaching it to my cons after my IS2 destroys your Obers, right after the KT. I don't mind facing Falls and JLI, at least you can win an engagement if you out micro your opponent. I'm glad to see the back of those mini gun wielding terminators. Hasta La Vista baby. Why would I pay 400 MP + 60 munitions for a squad that has the same performance as a 280 MP unit. In: Lobby