Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Vehicle Crew Thompsons, an overlooked ability?5 Aug 2015, 19:12 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 18:45 PMMittens It wouldn't be so problematic if it wasn't the only way to play USF right now Most efficient TD (dat crush yo) in the game + death crit artillery + late game AI call in tank + early game flamer + demo infantry = !!!FUN!! But yeah no the doctrine is borderline OP with the amount of crazy stuff shoved in it; the fact that USF needs help doesn't change the fact M10 spam is hellish to play against and Armor Company is just call in cancer for the new meta. Mobile Defense is the same way, ever since they pushed mediums so far back the very last call in meta doctrines have now been brought to the front of the current meta. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....5 Aug 2015, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 17:14 PMWingZero How can you let your Puma be destroyed by M5? Stuart is perfectly fine. It's not actually impossible, the M5 causes main gun destroyed on all light vehicles at 25% health so if it catches the Puma when at low health it can kill it. Now if you have multiple M5's.... or 222 paper armor is the problem , even double riflemen can scare it off Pretty much every light vehicle except the Luch's get's penned by the M5 because of the M5's insane fire rate. But yes the 222 has retardly thin armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues5 Aug 2015, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 15:41 PMWingZero Or we could buff the Su-85s? The thing is the SU-85 doesn't need buffs, it's already p good. The issue is that the SU-76 just outshines it due to cost/benefit ratio and versatility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Vehicle Crew Thompsons, an overlooked ability?5 Aug 2015, 16:01 PM I'm kind of hesistent here because while Crew Thompsons are wonky and over expensive Armor Company is currently the most powerful USF doctrine by a long shot due to M10 spam so buffing it further is kinda, uhm, problematic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 1v1 balance issues.5 Aug 2015, 14:34 PM USF struggles due to maps and predictability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV-25 Aug 2015, 13:07 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 13:02 PMJadame! Remove mp penalty, and instead of fuel bonus add -25% or -33% or whatever tank cost reduction (no more free resources to broke all timings possible). Done. I can see that being kinda broken with current T3. I mean the SU-76 spam and Quadmount spam would be unreal. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Flexibility and Variety for the less seen KV1 and KV25 Aug 2015, 13:06 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 06:18 AMelchino7 I'm not trying to sell it as a chaser, I'm just pointing out it's not an awful tank. Sure it's weak to dedicated AT (like most brawlers are) but your accusing me of something I'm not saying. It's got decent DPS at vet 3, and it's not the slowest tank in the game (especially compared to some others...) Iv just had good experiences with it in the past, if others can't find success with it I'll admit it probably needs help :/ In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 1v1 balance issues.5 Aug 2015, 04:38 AM Ostheer is strong, but kinda stale with how forced you are to use mobile defense to counter T3 abusers. Personally Iv found more success with the faction in 1v1 than 2v2 strangely enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target Change: Damage to Penetration5 Aug 2015, 04:15 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2015, 03:46 AMSkabinsk First lets "fix" Germanys get out of jail free card blitz and smoke on tanks, then talk about mark target. Attack ground and snares are hard EDIT: On topic I think is an excellent idea and the plane being shot down causing the effect to wear off would off interesting counter play. Do you think that the Command Panzer V should have it's mark target function differently or the same way? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2v2 rip USF ;_;75 Aug 2015, 02:22 AM All those fucking Priests holy fuck In: Replays