Profile of dpfarce

Hey mate, you're welcome to pop into the TAB teamspeak. There's about 3-4 regulars on in AUS time zone, and a few that jump in and out.

theangrybears.com

?

How to counter Fallshirmjäger with Sniper

1. Shoot them
2. Press T
3. Watch as Falls with their 0.001% moving accuracy completely fail to do any damage to the Sniper

Would just like to say $60NZD is like...well...

But we're in it for the glory, right bois?

Two good players and one terrible player made it to the top of the 3v3 ladder.

Strawman or not, the point you made earlier about 3s and 4s requiring "skill" that you have yet to define is still in contest, as proven by this photo.

This is just getting funnier and funnier.

1) You still think 4v4 takes individual skill compared to 1v1s and 2v2s. What are these "skills"
I've made the claim that individual "skill" , such as APM and map awareness, is irrelevant. Otherwise, CPU expert would be the lead balance authority and Adolf Hitler would have been more correct than Albert Speer.

This is the entire fucking point of this discussion. Being ranked X on the leaderboards, knowing the scatter values behind tank Y or having APM of Z/minute are all irrelevant to the strength of your argument. 90% of this shitstorm began because you attempted to discredit Northweapon's arguments based on his "skill" (whatever that is, because you reject my definitions), his faction preference and his leaderboard position. And then I pointed out that this was not a valid counter argument.

UKF has not been underpowered the past few patches, far from it. I would know that because of what OCF and my ladder rank has taught me. You're clueless.

You are the definition of a person relic should ignore. Most of your ranks are hidden, you haven't played anything apart from USF and Brits this patch, yet you feel the need to go on the forums and be the loudest, mere days after a patch.

I ignore the majority of 3v3+ players because none of them have any idea what they are talking about. Again, you play one faction 90% of the time, why should anyone give you the time of day?

There is no reason that you can't disagree with him. However, none of this addresses any points he has made. A simple, civil, non-hostile response explaining why his statistics do not support what he claims they support is the only way to discredit his argument, not attacking his player rank and faction preference.

"I played 1v1s and I know that you're wrong because I know" also is not a sufficient response.

So if the majority of good 1v1 and 2v2 players are playing all factions fairly equally, and team game players aren't, where is the validity in their argument?

The validity (or lack thereof) in their argument, Dusty, is the fucking argument. Not the person who makes the argument.

Until you are able to view arguments and disprove them on the merit of the evidence provided, and not on the person who made the argument, there is no point in having a discussion, as the argument is lost or won before it is made.