The SU-100 would be less mobile than the SU-85. It'd move at a slower speed with slower deceleration due to the extremely front-heavy nature of the vehicle.
No it shouldnt be that less mobile (it had the same Hp/weight ratio as the Su-85), it should still be a Su-85 with a better penetrating gun, in terms of performance. |
|
Would love to see some elite-non doctrinal sovjet infantry, as a counter to Obers.
Also, a Su-100/122P would be nice units for the sovjets, as they kinda lack late game AT.
|
I'm going to avoid getting into too many details but this was specifically with how someone interacted with our community. We wanted you guys to know that it was brought to our attention, and we hold ourselves to a higher standard than that.
That is great news! So happy! |
|
Always happy with better communication!
Would have been nice to see some details.
Hopefully Kubeljesus, Jagdtiger+Pak 43s shooting through shot blockers, and the lack of US Non-doctrional Elite infantry and US late-game will be looked into.
|
|
Just tested out the double Kubelrush against the US, went very well, obers out in 8mins + PUMA, stood no chance.
|
3 bars wut?
Ugh fill the squads up with as many BARs as you can 
I'll recommend it for having some fun on the battlefield, not That viable costwise. |
|
Pathfinders with 3 BARs is love and life, it is so fun to watch them tear down any sort of infantry .
I find them very useful, depends on the opposition if i Get them out on 2cp or wait a little more. |
It feels so frustrating to play against isu. The isu forces the axis player to get a jagdtiger or an elefant every game to be able to deal with it. Thats effective but so lame to play like that every single 2v2. flanking an isu is a wasted effort it is sitting behind a wall of mines. meeting a mine means pretty much you are screwed for you tanks. do not tell me to defuse mines while beeing under isu fire. and do not get me started about mark vehicle on an isu doctrine you can fuck up pretty much every tank with a few shots.
It is even more frustrating to fight against JT who outrange all allied tds/armour, and has the ability to shoot through cover for lols.
It goes both ways, but honestly bringing down an ISU with panthers are quite easy, especially after the frontal armour buff. Slow ISU cannot handle the power of the mighty blitz! |
|
I dont know but for me it feels like the infantry parthing may be a bit of the problem with it. My squads always seem to clump up tight with nearly no distance between the members, if the ISU hits the squad during this weird behaviour, it will wipe it.
Still the ISU us weird in many aspects, lack of AT capabilities, as it were known to have, but excels at sniping infantry ( tho rng accuracy is sometimes terribad). A 45kg HE Shell should punish lone/blobs of unsupported AT infantry walking headon into one of these, but meh it is hard to decide, this thing is just hard to balance. It should two shot most medium tanks at any ranges, but currently it needs 3-4. It shouldt need to penetrate any armour to deal critical damage, even in an frontal engagement, but this would hurt the gameplay as the german counterparts were just as good to one-shot tanks.
I would rather see a stronker AT ISU, than the current "Jack of all trades" support gun, or just simply remove the thing, and add the Su 100/122 to deal with the heavies.
|
I just found this on Reddit, i guess a change of mood is not bad.
Praise it.
Spreading joy and happiness to anywhere near you!
Glad I could make something funny out of the mighty Kubelwagen. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
![[KWA]GeneraI-G flag](/images/replay/soviets_flag.jpg)
