Profile of Maschinengewehr

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 334

General Information


Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 11:43 AMVipper This type of debate is completely nonconstructive and thus I will end from my part with this few points. The sniper critical ability will cause engine damage to all light vehicles, AT weapon that penetrate including Piats have a chance of causing engine damage so it does not take a miracle, in 2vs2 mode and above allied faction can use AT snares, Piat can dotrinally be given to other faction making very effective especially in conscripts. I.S. don't need a AT snare, that would cause more trouble than it would solve... Have a nice day. Bowing out, your point is made. The reliance on the sniper to snare has been debated endlessly. I'm pretty sure the majority think it's a stupid design decision. Leaving the ability to snare to chance isn't great either, especially since the devs are obviously trying to make the game more competitively viable. Strictly speaking from a 1v1 perspective here. Any combination outside of that is moot to argue. How so? Especially since it would be included in a sidegrade. Can't see why that would be an issue considering USF can do the same with zooks and vet 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 10:58 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 10:15 AMVipper You are welcome. And most units that have their engine damaged and all stationary targets. Did you actually see many in this thread post asking it to be nerfed? Oh so they have to run over a mine beforehand, or there mustn't be any sweepers around, or the other player must have chosen Spec Weapons for Boys AT for snares, or RNGesus has blessed an engine crit miracle out of nowhere? Or the PIATS are shooting at a bunker, truck or LeFH lol. Or alternatively just add an AT snare via the upgrade package at HQ for IS. And yes, there are a couple individuals here who are trying to make it seem that the PIAT is in need of a nerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 10:11 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 10:04 AMVipper People reply without bothering to reading and understand. No wonder this forum is mess... Piats are very efficient against large sized slow moving target, like the elephant and king tiger. It also very ineffective against fast small size targets.... Oh I've read it thankyou very much. So it's only effective against what, two or three specific units? Nurf naow pls! Against anything that moves faster its an absolute joke. I agree with the opinions of giving it some better accuracy and faster projectile speed, maybe along with a cost increase too if its performance justifies it. Can't see what the issue is with that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What happened to the M8 Scott?14 Dec 2015, 10:07 AM The thing is it also requires you to center your entire build around it too. Like you'll need both suppression and AT just to cover its arse, which is both expensive and overly micro demanding as USF. I used to love using them but its fallen far from grace. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Your most competitive USF commander?14 Dec 2015, 10:03 AM I've had the most success with Armor and teching both LT and Cpt into call-ins. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 10:01 AM People calling for the PIAT to be nerfed... No wonder this game is a mess... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 150 fuel panzer 4 increase it's penetration. 12 Dec 2015, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 10:10 AMAchtAchter I'm not here to prove your arguments. Especially when you insult me in your first sentence. You belittle me in the last few posts. Sorry to disappoint. I'm here to argue my opinions, not prove them to you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you prefer the "new" OKW or the "original" OKW?12 Dec 2015, 09:13 AM It's pretty clear that OKW is still in the testing phase. Voted Not sure/too soon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 150 fuel panzer 4 increase it's penetration. 12 Dec 2015, 09:08 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 08:48 AMAchtAchter Make a thread then, if you think this is an issue. I discuss the topic here, if you think other units are UP or OP then please go ahead and the discuss the issue. However it's not an argument to say; "hey, this unit might be too bad for this price, but so is another" - Two wrongs don't make one wright. Generalise all you want, belittle and be an elitist prick all you want, it's irrelevant. If anything I'd compare the cost of fielding a Wehr P4 compared to the OKW one. If OKW's is more expensive to field (I doubt it) then reduce the cost accordingly. However doing so would mean making it the same as the Wehr P4. After all, is the vet 2 armour as default and better vet bonuses justifed "coz OKW" now? Nope. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 150 fuel panzer 4 increase it's penetration. 11 Dec 2015, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2015, 11:01 AMBananenheld Not sure if troll or self projection Is it untrue? In: COH2 Balance