Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1217

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Brace needs a serious nerf.2 Sep 2015, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2015, 05:54 AMRMMLz Keep in mind that Flames, Schrecks and greanade (specially Baled Charges) do good amount of damage. Come again? Grenades wont do anything. The concept to make a unit almost immune to its supposed hard-counters is bad design. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uO68NiX7Uo#t=19m25s If my eyes don´t fail me the already damaged mortar emplacement took about 5% damage from that bundled grenade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits first impressions (post here)1 Sep 2015, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Sep 2015, 11:16 AMmycalliope first of all the okw is supposed to have the fucking best specialsit units why does the fucking brtits have them and why the fuck a vet5 unit is doing nohting agasint vet 3 units what is okw 5 vet for showpiece and they fucking sacrficie resoruces for it and brtis nope because u know relic are canadians..........and okw neither have even decent early game and mid game but they were supposed to have superb late game but nope relic fucked okw hard in this too....... I actually have to agree with this concern. OKW heavy vehicles cost you an arm and a leg and thus are a rare occasion. Unless you have been totally outplayed, you aren´t going to see more than one Panther on the field (talking 1v1, 2v2 here). Now it seems - and before people get annoyed I emphasize: Seems - that OKW vehicles are hardcountered by an entire faction. It hardly makes sense to field the heavies (Panther, Command Panther, KT, Jagdtiger) versus UKF. I´m not against a hard counter versus OKW vehicles. But on the other hand the resource penalty doesn´t make sense, if you don´t have better units. We will have to see on release, but it remains a concern for me. In: Lobby
Thread: New Commanders after British31 Aug 2015, 22:18 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2015, 22:11 PMSwift That's the face of someone who knows what he wants. You know what his face reminds me of? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove Infantry From Sd.Kfz 250 Halftrack Call-In31 Aug 2015, 20:41 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2015, 12:02 PMRMMLz Or give it the ability to reinforce at least. I'm fine with the Grens, at least they are capable of doing something. But the HT it self is only good for like one flank during mid game and that's all. +1 Just wanted to write this. A halftrack that can´t reinforce infantry seems odd. That way there would remain a reason to keep the unit alive. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzerwerfer - the forgotten Ostheer arty29 Aug 2015, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 15:59 PMAppleseed also mortar and rocket barrage vehicles are totally different use. one is field infantry support weapon, the other is design to knock out huge area of defense. Yes, mortars and late game artillery are two entirely different pair of shoes. If you are under 152mm, Katjuscha, B4 or Priest fire lategame, an Ostheer mortar won´t help you winning the game at all. Neither will the current Panzerwerfer. The (late) artillery game always goes to the Soviet player. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerwerfer - the forgotten Ostheer arty29 Aug 2015, 13:32 PM I still don´t get relics decision to nerf the Panzerwerfer after it already had been nerfed. 1) There was a time it was good. Maybe even too good. 2) Thus the reload time went up. It performed well. 3) Then out of the blue the performance was nerfed. It became shit. I´d like to see it perform like it did back then (Nr. 2). The increased reload balanced it. The lack of heavy non doctrinal artillery cripples Ostheer on specific maps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Patch 3 Sep28 Aug 2015, 12:01 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 11:34 AM_underscore Haha guys read your posts. Sully says: Quad is better Someguy responds: Wrong! Quad is better Butcher responds: Only in a vacuum, otherwise Quad is better. Someguy says: Look I tested! Quad is better. I am confused I was referring to "the fight could go either way." In a vacuum maybe, but people are moving their vehicles. Or you get nervous and try to get your vehicle out there. The Flak HT won´t be able to fire. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Patch 3 Sep28 Aug 2015, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 11:09 AMMr. Someguy Wrong, I've tested it in Cheat Mod. The Quad has a good chance to kill the 251/17. The fight could go either way. Often what happens is the 251/17 will suffer Main Gun Destroyed, giving the Quad an easy victory. Due to a bug, if the Quad gets Main Gun Destroyed, nothing will happen and it will keep fighting. In a vacuum maybe. In a real game the M5 wins as soon as the Flak HT starts to move. I just don´t see any reason the M5 should be allowed to fire on the move. One of the biggest issues with the M5 is its squad wiping ability by chasing down retreating squads on the move. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Patch 3 Sep27 Aug 2015, 22:16 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2015, 22:11 PMAchtAchter OKW Flak HT (55 Fuel), USF AA HT (60 Fuel). Both vehicles serve the same purpose like the M5 while being outclassed by it. The OKW flak HT looses in a 1vs1 against the M5. And of course the M5 can reinforce. They all have the same hp. I think the best thing would be to not allow it to fire on the move like it´s the case with the other hts. I don´t see why the other Flak hts aren´t allowed to do that and the M5 can happily chase retreating squads and wipe them. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: First Review British Forces27 Aug 2015, 09:20 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2015, 09:04 AMKatitof For the cost its not bad, but as a unit, well, I don't see a single reason to get churchil over comet. The increased repair speed that comes with "anvil" sounds decent though. In theory that should create a good synergy with the Churchill. In: COH2 Gameplay