Profile of JohnnyB

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198090176100


Thread: Relic has no idea how to balance.7 Aug 2015, 11:36 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2015, 11:30 AMSesleri Pls stop responding to these two.. EyelessJack and BigRed1 are either trolls or just truly deaf broken records. Nothing accomplished so far by engaging them. Add pussyking to the list, pls. And aaa. In: Lobby
Thread: Sturmtiger breaks the game7 Aug 2015, 11:24 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2015, 14:15 PMTobis Pussyking breaks the game. Pusyking breaks the boundries of fanboysm. Just give the man the supreme conscript squad with a red star painted on their arses that will reach Berlin while killing german tanks with empty hands. << what the soviet soldier does after he is hit by a tank? Answer: he stands up, dust himself off, and goes forward with uraaa!>> In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SU-76 issues7 Aug 2015, 08:11 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 22:44 PMhubewa Adaptation is the name of the game but if you get a unit that comes early and can deal easily with lategame units, you know there is a problem. If I get Luchs killing IS-2s frontally reliably, no one would be happy. Balance in a game is all about risk vs reward. The risk in playing out SU-76 is relatively low compared to proper AT guns, but the reward is disproportionally high. That's the main problem with it. I mean fine if it performs well early-mi game with decent damage + free barrage as it should. It's the endgame performance that I find ridiculous. Buff the SU-85 if it needs a buff by all means. EDIT: Like in VCoH, Tier 3 in sovs is designed for Early-midgame performance. M5 is the same in both Americans and Sovs, M8=T70, AT = SU-76 except the sovs can get AT and SU-76, SU-76 is mobile and SU-76 has barrage. There is no justifiable reason IMO to give it the endgame performance it has currently. Su-76 performs well against vehicles, even heavier ones, agreed, has that barrage ability that can kill infantry, appears on battlefield pretty quickly, and can be spammed. Agreed on all that. But it has a peel, not an armor, has no turret => it is quite vulnerable. What a soviet player would do? He has the choice of relying on T3 vehicles and wait for call ins in late game like KV1 s, Shermanns, ISU, IS-2. If he wants to have a powerfull army he cannot rely ont T3 and T4 both. I am telling you that if he relies on T3, he is quite exposed. No doubt quad + su-76 is a powerfull combo, but would that suffise to counter late game german armor? I would say no. Both axis factions have enough tools to deal with su-76s. Considering the efficiency / vulnerability ratio, is Su-76 realy OP? We don't count stugs as OP, do we? Flanking armor will erase all Su-76s on the map, guaranteed. And quickly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush7 Aug 2015, 07:47 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2015, 06:20 AMAradan Fanboy cry fanboy PS: i respekt you, but this is soo funny Well, I am a "light" fanboy, not a hardcore one. Fanboy because I like axis best, but nevertheless since a while I play all factions now and I enjoy them all. I hate when someone speaks for one faction only though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic has no idea how to balance.7 Aug 2015, 05:56 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2015, 03:26 AMThe Red Death Does anyone think that Relic has absolutely no clue what they are doing? They say they want to extend light vehicle combat and draw lower tiers out more but all they ended up doing was causing players do instead save up and go straight for medium tanks. Another thing they've messed up is the Soviets. Now moving the T34/76 to T4 cripples them due to the fact Ober and Ostheer can crank out a Panther at that point or a P4 which can wipe the floor with a T34. Every time they update the game it ends up ruining one faction in substitute for another. Dude, I understand your problems related to not having a game PC, playing once in 3 days, etc, but please, having in view your lack of experience in playing this game, stop making threads. What you said here is the least of this patch's problems. Soviet players are relying heavily on T3 right now, not T4 from where you can build the T34. And if they hold the ground for long enough against axis and reach T4, then God helps you when they will flood you with T34s. 'Cause now they are really cheap. Untill now, it's the best balance patch Relic did, it has a few issues, of course, but they are verry few and I am sure they will deal with them. You should have played this game one year ago, lol. Just to experience what lack of balance means. In: Lobby
Thread: M5 Quadrush7 Aug 2015, 05:46 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 22:22 PMaaa why it is good to keep M5 as is. Proof of scrub hardcore soviet fanboy posting. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues6 Aug 2015, 12:32 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 08:38 AMAradan And you must blob infantry? Yes, because blob is good, blob is life. In blob we trust. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Max Prestige Scumbags6 Aug 2015, 08:38 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 06:10 AMThe Red Death I can't win with this game lol. I play as Axis and my teammates ruin the early game and cost us the match, I switch to Soviets and my teammates ruin the late game and cost us the match. Automatch requires you to be perfect and it's annoying to keep yelling at the randoms you get paired with. I've taken so many losses because of it. Play 1v1 then. Like this, there is going to be only one person to blame. Or to praise. In: Lobby
Thread: Native Language Option6 Aug 2015, 07:41 AM I am for the native language. They should definetely introduce an option that allows units to talk in native language. In: Lobby
Thread: Pack Howitzer doesn't do it's job6 Aug 2015, 07:36 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 06:03 AMBeefSurge It's good at the job of killing blobs of troops and buildings. But the USF has tons of tools for stuff like this, and zero non doctrinal MP based counters to support weapons. Having the Pack Howie is a nice luxury, but the USF could really use s mortar instead. Pack Howitzer being good at killing blobs also defeats the purpose of going T1 as USF, because entire point in T1 is killing infantry with some light utility. Replacing it with a light 60mm mortar results in less RNG squad wipes(yay!), encourages T1 play(yay!), and solves the USF conundrum of dealing with support assets without dishing out fuel/going for a lucky flank. TBH everyone wins. So it's rather an opportunity matter. I see. In: COH2 Balance