Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Let's talk about the P-47 anti-tank Rocket Strike21 Oct 2014, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2014, 00:16 AMSierra Not necessarily, the Late War Germans still had a great many defensive emplacements, like FlaK towers and FlaK defenses just about everywhere. FlaK hit aircraft a lot and air losses were pretty heavy. and late war allies had numerical superiority, tank superiority, air superiority....HHAHAAHAHA In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do you think of an SU-85 buff?21 Oct 2014, 01:46 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2014, 01:13 AMGTTV All of my nope. This unit is performing perfectly find as it is. I remember the days of the dreaded SU85 spam. I still have PTSD from those days... Seriously though, I think the main reason we don't see this unit much anymore is because of the call-in meta. Fix that first then we can see how the SU85 performs with the new meta. Yes it doesn't perform that great against heavy call-in tanks at the moment, but if both players tech correctly this thing performs great. Wait and see before changing I say. It doesn't perform well against anything above a medium. I don't think it is a call-in meta issue. THe call-in meta may lead to the unit not being built, but it still performs rather poorly as a TD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Digging into Ardennes Assault’s All-New Meta-Map + bonus20 Oct 2014, 19:44 PM what is loomenarty In: Lobby
Thread: Let's talk about the P-47 anti-tank Rocket Strike20 Oct 2014, 19:02 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 16:35 PMvan Voort Instead it appears we are at: WAH! OKW armour is too good Nurf now please Counter it with P47s WAH! P47s are too good Nurf it now please loooooool In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does anyone have hope?20 Oct 2014, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 18:22 PMWiFiDi tbh it will take even more time iwth the new factions and whatever else they add into the game. and i have faith they will get it right i just don't know how long it will take. well time is money. don't know when the next big game is going to come and swoop up all the players In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do you think of an SU-85 buff?20 Oct 2014, 17:50 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 17:41 PMTheMightyCthulu The Soviets - the real ones, fighting during WWII - found the SU-85's gun had trouble penetrating Axis armour, so it looks like Relic has this spot on. It's historically accurate, but doesn't make for good gameplay. Replace the SU-85 with the SU-100, and problems solved. True, the SU-100 only really saw action in 1945, but just getting rid of the SU-85 for it would solve player complaints. hey I love the idea of SU-100, but I doubt Relic would add new units that are not part of DLC In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do you think of an SU-85 buff?20 Oct 2014, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 16:22 PMvan Voort It was not too hot before, as it basically had no AI and it was very hard to get offensive with T4. Now there is the Jackson, which makes it look even worse I know right. Those nondoc Jacksons, Panthers, and KTs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For those who think 4v4 soviet is unbalance, watch !20 Oct 2014, 17:29 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 17:03 PMludd3emm I think you should upload the replay and explain there instead of starting a new thread and redirecting to another forum. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New to 4 VS 4 ? Read this first !20 Oct 2014, 17:25 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 16:42 PMhkwh01 Watch replay and learn to play soviet well : http://www.gamereplays.org/companyofheroes2/replays.php?game=83&show=details&id=298744 You do realize even top 200 4v4 Allied players have trouble scraping wins? In: Lobby
Thread: History Forum20 Oct 2014, 17:21 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 16:38 PMRomeo how about the Theater of History? Those are just little informative topics. It would be nice to have a little section dedicated to historical posts like ToH. In the COH2 forum, historical debates frequently get mixed in with topics on the game. It would be nice to separate them to avoid confusion. In: Site Feedback