|
In my last game i lost one guy of the sniper squad and had the feeling that the range was reduced after that. Was it always like this, did i miss something or was it another sneaky change? |
|
In the latest Hotfix they fixed an issue with vet. But now i feal a bit confused about merge.
Do the conscript entity keep their received accuracy and their vet and just the weapon will change? And what about its upkeep? Will the entity get the pop cost of the new unit or the conscript one?
Hope someone knows about it. |
Thread: T-34/7610 Sep 2014, 06:57 AM
The PIV have a chance to penetrates the front armor of the T34 at max range with 75%. The T34 penetrates the PIVs front armor to 44% at max range. If you want to lose that fight with the PIV you have to handle him very poorly. |
|
Thx for the response. |
So i will give the B4 a try as soon as i see Panzerfüsiliere. I hope it wont delay the shocks (  ) to much. 
|
In the context of 2v2 especially, Allied synergies ie. vs Paks or Pgrens are by and large tangibly superior, for example: Sov. sniper play, Shocks, Arty of all kinds (especially B4 and Katyushah) to include 120 mm mortars, ISU 152. The commonly encountered IS-2 doc by itself contains Shocks and incendiary arty both of which are very useful at forcing off or dislocating Paks and supporting inf prior to commiting the IS-2. If you are looking for some (admittedly cheesy, but undoubtedly very effective methods) of how to render ie. Paks all but useless, look for Sibs/VonIvans teamgames in the stream section.
I dont think the Allied Arty is superior to the German one like the Wurfrahme 40, Mortarhalftrack, light artillery barrage or long range infantery like Obersoldaten. I dont want to say German options are better, but i dont think they are inferior. |
Of course you can compare the two 1v1, that exact fight does increasingly happen, and if it comes down to it, the IS2 has the edge.
I get that your point is that it is more pertinent to look at the unit in conjunction with its overall faction structure, true, and I concure that ie. the Pak is superior to the ZiS for AT purposes, but also consider that the Soviets possess better tools to fight the German AT support than vice versa.
What do you mean with better tools to fight the German AT support? I dont see any tools superior to the German one. |
@Kam: 1 on 1, IS2 actually defeats the Tiger pretty reliably. It has significantly stronger armor and slightly better penetration going for it, while the Tiger has a slightly faster reload. The IS2 is also faster. As always, RNG can eff you over, but on average, the IS 2 will come out ahead comfortably enough.
the probleme is you cant compare IS2 and Tiger 1 vs 1. Tiger has the better AT support + its better against infantery and less armored vehicles because of the ROF.
IS2 is a good Tank but its not better than a Tiger. |
|
I have some problems in late game to counters this combo in 2v2. How do you deal with the Combo of Jagdtigr and Tiger on small 2v2 maps? I think only AT gun spam is an option since its very hard to flank without having way more Tanks.
What do you use against this combo? |
|
I take option C.
Give the Tiger Ace a fuel price and take away every drain.
At the current state you get punished if you dont lose the Ace after some time, because the drain never stops.
I have the feeling, balance wise its better to just dont buy the Ace on credit. |
Germany
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
