Profile of broodwarjc

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 824

General Information
Register Time: 5 Jul 2014, 03:34 AM
Last Visit Time: 9 Jun 2023, 11:33 AM
Steam: 76561197974357014
Birthday: 1989-06-02
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Winnipeg
Game Name: Broodwarjc

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Dawn of War to CoH4 May 2016, 12:02 PM I liked DOW1 for its larger armies and base building, did not like DOW2 for its smaller scale and no base building and fewer unit types(although it did have better combat control). Sounds like they are going to try and mix the two for this game: large armies with base building, and the combat control of DOW2. In: Other Games
Thread: Updates on BALANCE PREVIEW MOD 1 May 2016, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2016, 21:39 PMnee Have to agree, playing a few matches I fond VOlks just as blobsworthy, but now even more effective because they can let you dominate early game and grab resources to go for tanks. You either succeed and Volks just get relegated to dealing with infantry, or you don't and you need to start using Pumas and Rak43s. This is even more so because you have zero AT infantry alternatives; at least before you could use Volks to augment other AT efforts. It's an interesting change in how you play as OKW...but not in the way that does away with Volksblob. Most of the enemies I fought with them were infantry too, which means that Volks can often end up being even more effective because the blob can wipe out anything- in this case the mod just switches from vehicles to infantry. I actually think that, if I had a blob and given two upgrade options- one AI and one AT- the result would be more diverse and versatile, but not in a blobbing way. Take for example a blob of four Volks squads- either four schrecks or four STGs, they are pretty powerful. 2x of each may make them more versatile but also means that they are less effective against clumps of either. With that in mind I think the real solution should be raising their vet requirements plus further nerfs. Heck, I'd think giving them the cover bonuses like Infantry Section can drastically affect Volksblobbing, they'd get cut down to shreds fast unless you micromanage them behind cover and buildings. It can be defensive bonuses instead of rate of fire. TLDR: no matter what upgrades you give to Volks, their current stats as squads makes them blobworthy, not the weapons they can upgrade to. The change to Volks was not to stop an AI blob... it was to stop an AT blob. The problem was a rolling wave of 6 Shreks, with 5 men for retreating and surviving and with 5 levels of Vet, for the loads of Allies' medium tanks. The change was in no way to stop the Volks blob (all factions can blob right now with at least one of their units), but it was to give Allies tanks in all game modes(especially team modes) a better chance against OKW. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Mod - Your Thoughts After Using It29 Apr 2016, 16:11 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2016, 13:20 PMWHO In team games you'd have shreks and caches...and ostruppen Also TWP, cheap spammable TDs in Stugs, plus the doctrinal arty/air support options are much better for Ost over OKW. I think Ost is better at defense and OKW is more aggressive, they just both have a non-doc HMG now... In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Mod - Your Thoughts After Using It29 Apr 2016, 11:16 AM Typical players still going to complain about the things they ask for. Players want more variety and build orders so Relic buffs Penals into CQC unit, players complain it is too similar to doctrinal Shocks. Relic allows OKW to build non-doc HMG with a more powerful one in doc, players complain about two HMGs. Not every unit available to you is there to be built EVERY game. I don't even know if the pop-cap will allow one of every type of unit to be built at the same time. You want choices, but no holes in factions; redundancy will result. No one is forcing you to use both the MG34 and the MG42 and no one is forcing you to use the Penals and Shocks. Maybe you want to skip T1 to rush a T70, so no Penals for you, then grab a Shocks doc. Maybe you want a more powerful HMG later in the game, well then pick a doc with the HMG42. In: Lobby
Thread: The poor little sherman27 Apr 2016, 15:49 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2016, 14:19 PMFalseAlarm Ok I think some fellas are confused by the options. They perhaps confusing the question for "Do you think the sherman needs buffs?" or "Do you think the switching should be removed?" So they said yes to those questions. Are you being sarcastic or are you upset that 24 people(as of this post) have voted "Yes" to your question of: "Should it still require switching?" compared to 6 that voted "No"? If you only want people to validate your own opinions then the internet is the wrong place for you or at the very least these forums are. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Should the SU FHQ be able to produce some units?26 Apr 2016, 12:50 PM I voted no. The only change I could see would be to remove the unit buffs the FHQ gives and give it a buy-able forward retreat point. Maybe do the same to the Ost reinforce bunker(since this is almost never built over the medic bunker). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is USF answer to Koenigstiger25 Apr 2016, 13:31 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 13:05 PMFalseAlarm This topic is half strategy half balance. At first I wanted to make it on the strat section, but now that we are close to a major patch I tough having some suggestions here would be nice as well. With the shreck being remvoed stalling is no longer possible, you either build a puma or a PIV. Major arty getting a buff is also a helping hand. But how about the m36? Does it need any kind of buff? Your thread is half okay/half crap. If oyu need help answering the KT then ask for it in the strategies section. If you think the KT is OP then ask for opinions or give some better poll options then buff USF, buff USf, buff USF, buff USF, buff USF. I won't mention the playercard, but can you at least post a replay before asking for unit nerfs as we have no way to determine if the unit is OP or you need to L2P? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The future of COH2 post April / May patch25 Apr 2016, 13:20 PM I love how another player steps forward to speak for the silent masses. 1.OKW was not a shelter for Ost players, Ost was played more than OKW in the ESL tourney. 2.Your options for Axis players on the bottom of your post don't include this option: 7)Everything will be fine and players will adapt as they have with every patch for the last 5 years. 3.I am a heavy OKW player(just look at my playercard) and even I get bored of running Shrek blobs every game. I am totally for testing out some changes. 4.This thread is overall pointless, the title is misleading, and all you are accomplishing is trolling by calling out fanbois and crying. In: Lobby
Thread: Update on the 27th preview24 Apr 2016, 02:25 AM miragefla, Thanks for making your mod. You have gotten a lot of crap over something that you don't even have control over(miragefla can't force Relic to put any of the proposed changes into the main game). I am happy to try out the mod when it releases and see what changes are good and which could use some more work. Overall I think some of the overhauls listed are a long time coming and once people play them for a bit will at least be a little less paranoid(no way these forums will ever be quiet). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Updates on BALANCE PREVIEW MOD 24 Apr 2016, 02:20 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2016, 19:55 PMBlackKorp "Some of these changes may seem a bit radical but what better time to try radical ideas than during a Balance Preview Mod. Players should not expect all these changes to make it into the Patch as it is or for all the changes to make it into the Patch. " - Thats why it's called a preview This should be pasted to the first post. So much over-reacting to a mod. In: Lobby