Profile of Bananenheld

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198000494642


Thread: IS 2 problem 24 Dec 2015, 19:03 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2015, 16:52 PMUGBEAR Rework vet 1 for all soviet tanks, increase accuracy for IS-2, and adds some deflection damage for its 122mm gun, I mean 122mm gun got to have some awesome impact even without a armor penetrating! and T-34/85 for non-doc....... So you really think that would be balanced? I would bet 100$ that soviets would be fotm with this change In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Experience from mines.24 Dec 2015, 14:52 PM The idea is flooding around for a while now and i honestly cant see a single con but so many pro's for this idea! +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: t34 76 now useless23 Dec 2015, 15:15 PM ram should be a powerful vet 1 ability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak 43 vs 17 Pounder Population costs.22 Dec 2015, 17:17 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2015, 17:08 PMZombiFrancis I've never really understood the purpose of pop cap in CoH2, especially since there's a great mechanic in place already: upkeep. The more units a player fields, the less manpower the receive. I don't see why the game couldn't be balanced around a 100 pop sized army, throttling manpower income exponentially as it grows beyond that size. I get that there may be technical implications to pop cap for the purpose of preventing too many models on the field at a given time. I'm curious as to if this is the actual purpose of pop cap. I could imagine that pop cap prevents snowballing. So the Player who is ahead will always be ahead because he can pump out even or more number of units without pop cap as is opponent who is behind. But im not sure on it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give Brits vCoH style trenches instead of Otheer copypasta22 Dec 2015, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2015, 13:43 PMgunther09 left one looks like a trench, the right thing looks like a poorly built shit hole In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enough is enough, fix the volks21 Dec 2015, 11:20 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2015, 22:46 PMA big guy 4u Absouletly 100% agree. It's disgusting that a mainline infantry squad can get AT weapons. AT defense like panzerfaust or AT nades? Sure. But a bona fide tank killer? Seriously, mix Volks with schrecks and Sturmpios and the map is yours. What do the wehraboos say? Get MGs? Yeah, except the Volk flame nade is also disgustingly OP. No timer, very long range and quick to throw. OKW is still OP. LeIG spam was just the tip of the iceberg. So no zooks for usf anymore too?o O In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should you be able to purchase Pershing skins individually?20 Dec 2015, 14:58 PM Thread opened again In: Lobby
Thread: AT vs Randoms18 Dec 2015, 15:16 PM Would be interesting how the winrates change when 4v4 AT Teams only play versus 4v4 AT Teams and the same with 4v4 randoms tbh In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is completely out of control15 Dec 2015, 09:31 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 07:53 AMNEVEC Officers already have free weapons, elite infantry already have tomsons/m1919. I don't think you will upgrade weapon crews or assault engeneers with bazookas or bars. Just turn on sprice Stream, bars on pathfinders, bars on rear. But hes a noob ofc and doenst change the fact you got the flexibility to go for zooks on every squad usf has. But im wasting time again Edit: if you want to trade racks with global upgrade,hit me up. I bet most okw and ostheer players would take racks over global (lmg pio Inc ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is completely out of control15 Dec 2015, 07:35 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 17:09 PMNEVEC Riflemans and rear echelones? Yes usf only has these 2 infantry units. Not more at all In: COH2 Balance