Profile of ElSlayer

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198020912674


Thread: RELIC: how about an update_news_something3 Oct 2014, 12:14 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2014, 09:14 AMtuvok NDA = Not Doing Anything * Mind * Blown *** Genius. In: Lobby
Thread: Can we have a video like ASAP in WOT?3 Oct 2014, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2014, 10:19 AMnwglfls In world of tanks, weeks or even month before launching the new patch, they will make a video to introduce you all the new incoming content and balance change, this kind ASAP video can allow player see the progress of the game developer have been made and can definitely introduce new players, ^ In: Lobby
Thread: AI started abusing Kubles whats going on2 Oct 2014, 14:32 PM In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: 1000 VP Games 2 Oct 2014, 11:10 AM I'd better see devs using their time to do other stuff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Months later, still no adjustment to the Forward HQ2 Oct 2014, 11:08 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2014, 10:34 AMcapiqua - OST can make bunkers reinforced/health - SOV have FHQ. - USF have ambulance. - OBW have trucks with reinforced/health. It is a design problem of the 4 factions. Wrong. You're comparing non-doctrinal things with doctrinal FHQ. Soviet have M5 to reinforce. Which costs less fuel, mobile and can be upgraded to M17 for AI/AA. Still it costs fuel and forces you to tech shitty tier (unless you play Lend-Lease Tactics which also gives a great medium tank so no T3 needed). Closest thing to M5 is Wehrmacht SdKfz 251, which cost fuel and can be upgraded for better AI too. BUT, as you said, Wehrmacht have bunkers which cost no fuel. In 2v2+ USF player can decrew their Ambulance truck for soviet to take it. USF get medics and soviets get forward reinforcement and healing. I see no faction design problems here. Problem is in Urban Defence Doctrine and in knowing(not knowing) how to deal with it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1000 VP Games 2 Oct 2014, 07:09 AM It will split population (if some players choose ONLY 1000 VP games) which will result in even worse matchmaking. IF it would be an OPTION for custom games ONLY then I'm okay with that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdtiger - The Gamebreaker1 Oct 2014, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 06:34 AMJohnnyB Heeey, you forgot P-47 air attack from Paras doctrine. A few missiles can bring that thing to 30% life. Allied have counters to JagdTiger. They only have to.... oh, USE THEM. P-47 is too OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Addition of T34 to the Soviet HQ to resolve tech problems30 Sep 2014, 18:26 PM Better add KV-85 to tier 3 or 4. It is EXACTLY the kind of non-doctrinal unit needed for soviet late game - mediocre DPS, high survivability, adequate penetration. They were built on base of KV-1S, which was faster than KV-1 and had better mobility on weak grounds because of wider tracks and lesser weight. Tier may be reworked like: T3 - M5, T-34, SU-85, Katyusha T4 - T-70, SU-76, KV-85 Also you won't have to change any existing commanders. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Addition of T34 to the Soviet HQ to resolve tech problems30 Sep 2014, 14:25 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 13:50 PMAerohank The only problem Ostheer has against T34/85s is that they outnumber P4s because they are call-in tanks and thus require no tech investment to call-in. Having a 120 fuel unlock barrier will fix this. Other call-in units still would be available without spending 120 fuel on teching. If you want to bind call-in units to tech, I think you should do it for all call-ins. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 4v4 is a joke30 Sep 2014, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 07:29 AMvan Voort Ensure that OKW do not get benefit from caches. At the moment OKH can build them and OKW benefit in a way that their faction is not designed to ^ In: COH2 Balance