Profile of Partisanship

The reason was that the model glitches when it crews certain team weapons.
Just like this: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1934863603

Oh yeah. Thanks for reminding me.
I wonder how difficult it would be to just fix that.

60 munitions - reinforce and repair times reduced and infantry sprint while out of combat. 30s duration

Oh jeez I know it's self indulgent to theory craft on what could replace these abilities but what if we had it as a toggle-able ability like what it used to be like for the OKW?

As in, another way for this to work is by having this ability reduce manpower cost to reinforce, but so long as it is active, it will reduce income of other resources. Maybe -2 fuel and - 5 ammo per tick?

Weird concept, but maybe have Rapid conscription/relief infantry work as an indirect bonus rather than straight up free units?

Specifically, the idea I had in mind was that if any infantry (not crews) gets reinforced at the headquarter (and HQ only) will have indefinite sprint until they arrive at any of the frontline sectors (as in any sector of the map that is attached to an opponent's captured sector). That way, the idea of fast reinforcement is still there, but works mechanically as allowing you to get retreating squads back in action.
Thus achieving
A) The CoH tradition of preserving units rather than throwing them away
B) Thematicall appropriate effect without upsetting balance

The only thing I can think of is how that may be abused. How? Can't say, but there's probably something like bugs, et cetera if not properly implemented.

Edit: Forgot to add that this is meant to become a passive rather than active. If it was active, I wouldn't know what to put on duration or cost.

1. Why have OKW not a good AT? raketen was ok when volks had schrecks....now they lost it, OKW armor was nerfed hard...okw has no good AT ...even the jagdpz4 was nerfed...it is so slow, that it will be flank from all other and the poor accurracy while turning is a joke....remind: it has no turrent and turns nearly slow like a elephant...puma is not that good while even pistole dmg it and mostly every allie infantery can equip handheld AT

2. why has the sov 120 mortar his old range, while all other light arty was nerfed?
it outrange ay other field light arty, can retreat, has high wiping potencial, has 6 model crew and survive..even with one model left..

3. why are cons with ppsh now the best infantery when u look to the price/ effency?

4. why can IS equip double brens/ vickers and shredd then all axis infantery in secounds?

5. the new jackson is a big joke...it is very fast, has good accurracy, TURRENT, good HP and nice dmg output.
2 them denied all alli armor...u can kit tanks, because of the turrent, speed and and good hp...but mostly they destroy ervy armor in secounds...no reson to kit


you make the allies much more easy mode in teamgames than they was since brit was released

I'm just going to weigh in a few, though I don't believe my perspective is entirely accurate since I mainly play the base game factions the most in matchmaking. Even so, I do play plenty custom matches within groups that gave me a whirl at every faction.

1. OKW certainly does not lack as much AT as you may like to believe. Raketen, consistency aside, is the only camoed AT gun that can crawl forward to cloak cap points as well as set up ambushes. Plenty of games where I lost a vet 3 light armor or even medium armor because it strolled into two cloaked raketenwerfers that get off two volleys. It's fairly reliable AT gun if you are more nimble with positioning, unlike pak40s that may do far better being static and holding major angles down.

Jagdpanzer4 is a tricky thing, and I'm surprised so many complain about it without noting the virtues. First off, it's the only medium tank hunter with 230 frontal armor. That's pretty good on deflection chances against most medium non-TD tanks. Granted, vet 2 nerf on even more armor is unfortunate, but you get accuracy buff instead, which was a consistency issue before. Also, last I checked, the Jagdpanzer4 is rather good on rotation speed. Not sure what made you feel that it's bad at turning. Puma's not terrible, but the damage it deals is a bit weak. Ever since they nerfed puma's target weak point and machine gun, it is seeing a whole lot less action.

2. 120 mm is cancer, but I don't know what would be a good means of nerfing it without blasting it into obscurity.

3. Cons are cheap and the PPsh gives them a very good close range damage. However, they're only good for assaulting. When it comes to holding ground, any other upgraded infantry would be a far better choice. They do have a ton of utility, but when you consider that Soviets don't have much in non-doctrinal infantry options outside of Cons and Penals, I find that it's a necessity.

4. IS double weapon carry is being looked at last I checked. Wasn't smith going to force all squads to carry only 1 weapon at a time?

5. Jackson buff is strong, but dearly needed for the poor US who pretty much has no late game unless they invest in a pershing or cheese with a calliope. A little more hitpoint at the cost of 20% damage nerf seems acceptable to me. This is a good change for US players since this means OKW and even Wermacht can't just turtle for late game armor and expect an easy win.

If you can kamikaze your tank and not lose it, you've probably already won. And which faction are you suggesting is fixing too fast? Which unit? Or do you mean repair in general? Last patch nerfed a good few on repair speed so not sure where you are coming from with the complaint.