Profile of Brachiaraidos

I find it funny as all hell that most posts in support go like this:

"Demo charges shit and OP and terrible for the game!

Americans blob please give Axis moving, camo, remote control demo charge"

Uh-huh, yeah, no. Nope. Not even once. With the massive focus on unit preservation a guideable demo charge is the last thing we need ever. It was bad in CoH 1 where squad spacing was better and artillery was turbocharged and nades had small suns in them. We've come so far since then, lets not have a step back.

Well, we don't know that.

The same way we didn't know that the British weren't coming, right?

New commanders seems dumb as a focus when custom ones are coming anyway...

Ideally? Rifle section. 5 man squad, Bren upgrade, Piat as an AT snare, rifle grenade akin to Ost.

I'd quite lime to see the UK mortar to be, rather than the same old 3in/80 odd mm, come as a 2in mortar section with a battery of 2. Very high rof but smaller range & blast. Of course it'd be a be awkward to do with the way weapon teams work unless they did something new with the engine and made them one man per mortar with the extra crew standing around... but I like the concept, at least.

Vickers HMG, 6pdr like the US at gun but with a higher price and better standard round. Seems to cover all the bases.


The alternative I'd like for the 2in mortar to show up, for the record, is a weapon upgrade to rifles that can only fire standing still with a toggle to fix the squad in place like the m1919 gives

There should be some sort of wave system, everyone on these forums and CoH.com deserve the chance to test this before the general public. Why? Because this community is the one through bad and good stuck with it, its not much to ask for Relic to toss a bone to its loyal community, probably one of the most loyal communities I have seen during my gaming experience.

No. Stop. Self entitlement levels peaking at maximum cringe.

Nobody 'deserves' a chance to get to play an unreleased product early just because they enjoy the game it's based on. The people that got in didn't 'deserve' it and nor do the people that did not.

Relic just needs some more people to stress test the alpha build and no amount of cherry picking could EVER be deemed impartial.

We got RNG'd, possibly with some input based on form answers. For picking our some people to essentially put more load onto an alpha build than Relic can manage, this is exactly how things should be done.


This isn't about the players, it's bot about the game, it's not about 'a split in the community'.

Literally, relic needs people using their alpha so they know what breaks when it gets used. That's why an alpha even exists. There's absolutely no other weight attributed to their decision that isn't fabricated by people imagining some sort of fictional snub or injustice to try and avoid facing the reality that they didn't get a thing they would have kinda liked to have but have no right to.