Profile of Cannonade

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 752

General Information


Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 16:19 PMKatitof You've asked good question, I gave general answer The question was for a specific and exact proposal. (and addressed personally to another poster, so as to understand their personal proposal on the issue) So no, your "general" answer failed there again. General is sort of the exact opposite of specific and exact, fyi. You said you would ignore my posts, well, do so then. I know you don't like me, but stop trying to destroy the thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some suggestion for Puma with Soviet27 Aug 2014, 16:12 PM Let this bad thread expire please. Its 3 days necro, and already dead on arrival. In: Lobby
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 16:05 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:53 PMKatitof I'll just stop and try to ignore you in the future threads. Well, that sadly didn't last long. Also, you seem to have difficulty in reading again: Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 15:45 PMCannonade What exactly, and specifically, is the change to Cons you personally propose? I PERSONALLY asked Volsky for HIS personal specific proposal. Him, personally. Not you. So unless you are accidentally posting on the wrong account, you have no business answering for him. I asked him for his personal proposal. Not you. Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 15:58 PMKatitof Anything will go, from weapon upgrade, to better vet scaling/late tier upgrades/oorah additional effects at vet3, basically anything that isn't doctrinal. Notice the use of the words EXACTLY and SPECIFICALLY in my question that was addressed PERSONALLY to another poster? So there again, you misread as there is nothing exact or specific in your answer anyways (to a personally addressed post that wasn't even directed at you in the first place.) When I want your opinion, I will ask for it. (And no, that will never happen). Now stop it, you are destroying the thread in more ways than one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 15:45 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 15:43 PMVolsky That's not my goal. Fine. Then lets get real here. What exactly, and specifically, is the change to Cons you personally propose? So far Ive only seen whining, contrived theoretical scenarios, "i dont like this and that", hyperbole, an apprent degree of faction bias and a good deal of personal attacks from you. What EXACTLY is it you would suggest be the SPECIFIC changes made to Cons? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 15:36 PM Bad_vader and Volsky: Fine. Then remove Oorah/Merge, and make PPSH a native upgrade at T1+. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 14:56 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:50 PMBad_Vader This is what the thread is trying to address, the utility of conscripts in the mid-late game. They have a high level of utility THROUGHOUT the game, owing to the native factors of being 6man, cheap, and the 2 abilities, that no other baseline units have, right from the start. Do you understand what I am saying? Other units don't have these things. Instead, they have DPS upgrade utility at Muni cost. You seem to be asking that Cons have BOTH that high level of utility that they uniquely have, right from the start, that other units dont have, AND then also a DPS upgrade utility ONTOP of those for mid-lategame. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 14:47 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:35 PMBad_Vader I don't think you understand how things are at the moment. To simplify it: grens>cons grens w/ lmg>>>>cons That's taking into consideration all their stats. See the disparity? However you look at it gren are just a lot more cost effective than cons are, what this thread is trying to do is bring cons closer to the cost effectiveness of grens. This isn't about asymmetrical balance because in the first place comparing both of them will lead you to the conclusion that grens outperform cons. Thats just false though. Grens=Cons LMG Grens>Cons (Obviously, for 60Muni) Both cost the same. Both stats are optimised for small arms vs opposing factions model counts. Both have the same Vet stats. Both carry AT/AI ordnance options of asymmetric equivalency. Cons have 6man and cheaper reinforce. Cons have 2 native abilities. Grens have weapon upgrade. I have no idea where you have gotten it into your head that vanilla Grens > vanilla Cons. I completely disagree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:29 PMNinjaWJ cons squads flat line around mid game Part of the problem is that Cons come out of the box as a 6man, cheap reinforce unit with 2 native abilities. They appear "flat" in terms of progression because they already have so much utility right from the get go. The only "advantage" Grens have over Cons, is their weapon upgrade option (subject to Muni investment) Whereas Cons have the "advantages" of 2 abilities, 6man and cheaper per man reinforce. See what I mean? Molotov and ATNade dont drop off anymore substantially than RNade or Faust towards lategame. I dunno what you mean by this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 14:33 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:25 PMKatitof Is ppsh negative equivalent to grens G43? Is molotov? Is AT nade? Doctrinal. Irrelevant. Asymmetric equivalent Asymmetric equivalent Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:25 PMKatitof And stop saying cons are cheaper to reinforce. 5x20 is not less then 3x90. Cheaper PER MAN. Learn to read. Deliberate misrepresentation. Dishonest. Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:25 PMKatitof 6 men squads are balanced by incomparably better dps of german squads, its already factored in the balance, so it is no argument at all. Implying small arms are the only weapons/ordnance on the battlefield. Deliberate omission. Dishonest. Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:25 PMKatitof Also, there is no such thing as vanila vet3 grens, LMG is too effective not to have it, so its not an argument as well. There is such a thing, and the LMG comes at a 60muni cost, which therefore was not spent elsewhere, which qualifies the unit having better DPS. Deliberately ignoring the economic cost. Dishonest. Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:25 PMKatitof Just admit already that you give no shit about buffing cons so they are actually useful after 8 minute and leave the thread instead of zealously defend your grenadiers right to walk over them in any circumstances. Deliberate personal attacks. Disregarded. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My thoughts & ideas on Conscripts27 Aug 2014, 14:27 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2014, 14:23 PMThe Silver Sage Did you read my post further up in response to your questions? I'd like to hear your opinion on it. I did read it, and think its good in theory. I'd be alright with implementing it as you propose. However I have a very bad feeling its not at all what some of the "others" here actually want, if you know what I mean. I fear you are going to get a lot of poopoo from some of them on it. In: COH2 Balance