Profile of LevelOneDm

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 14

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback29 Dec 2020, 00:37 AM M3 HT buff when? The M5 and Osteer HT are much more effective in comparison for similar costs The only advantage of the M3 is it's extra range, but with it's terrible dps, it's not really a good trade off, for the major reductions it receives in that regard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Dec 2020, 00:36 AM M3 HT buff when? It's literally the worst HT in game with actually negative utility with the drop cost/timing make it worse than grabbing it from a forward assembly/base In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback28 Dec 2020, 02:45 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2020, 11:42 AMMMX how so? the cromwell's main gun ai performance is superior to the majority of the medium tank roster, and with the recent buff to its hull/coaxial mgs it shouldn't be far behind in that department, either. The AI performance of the main gun only beats the T-34 and sherman normal shells (reminder sherman has he shells), it's mgs are still far behind the t-34 and the shermans. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback19 Dec 2020, 07:03 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2020, 00:46 AMProtos Angelus Cromwell is a decent tank. Low profile and constant moving = hard to chase and hit. Decent enough AI power and a normal AT gun for flanking + smoke. Don't underestimate cheap medium tanks. Both sherman and cromwell, while being weaker than the axis counterparts in the raw performance, they more than make up for in other areas Low profile? It's the same target size as the p4, it has the weakest Ai out of any stock medium tank, and has similar At capability of the Sherman. So all it has is speed, and with nothing backing it up, that's pretty terrible since it does get the on the move accuracy the sherman gets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback18 Dec 2020, 22:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2020, 11:41 AMVipper How many AT infatry are needed to beat a Churchill? That is definition of damage sponge, it can take damage but not dish out, it is supposed to be supported by other units that dish out the damage. As for Churchill its damage potential is not "fake", it has the damage output similar to that of Cromwell. Yes and cromwell is the worst medium tank in the game, so yeah it's bad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback18 Dec 2020, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2020, 08:33 AMVipper - Reload from 6.125/7 to 6.125 Thanks, I forgot that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback18 Dec 2020, 22:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2020, 05:01 AMmrgame2 you cant compare sturmtiger to churchill bro! i think a pop revert is fair with the tank commander and pintle upgrade now. Why can't I compared the sturmtiger and the churchill? They are both tanky Ai tanks, the pintle upgrade is one of the weakest in the game and isn't an upgrade but something you get with vet. The tank commander gives it vision and 10% accuracy on the main gun, which only helps with hitting other tanks which isn't incredibly useful. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback18 Dec 2020, 04:36 AM So what's the purpose of reverting the Pop change on the Churchhill infantry tank, So here's the overview of the changes: Ability to get tank commander (fairly minor buff) A Pintle with 2 long range dps with VET 1 (Minor Buff, but it does help give Ai) Reduced rear armor to 150. 19 --> 18 --> 19 Increased Reload speed(Thanks Vipper) How does any of this actually make the Churchhill infantry tank viable? I'd also like to point out if the argument is that it's too tanky, then why does the Sturmtiger with veterancy get more hp and frontal armor yet only requires 18 pop. How does any of this make sense? The reason the change was implemented in the first place, is that the UKF already has insane pop cap requirements. It is the highest pop cost for an AI tank and yet it has some of the least effective AI for a tank intended in that role. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback30 Nov 2020, 22:53 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 19:26 PMPhoenix101 Double Fact Check - FALSE You count up the buffs and tell me then, what % of USF changes are buffs and nerfs? Looking forward to your answer. USF Ambulance: Minor Buff Bar drop rate: Buff Rear Echelon: Minor Buff Minor Nerf Net: Zero m1 81mm Mortar: Minor Buff 50cal: Nerf M20: Minor Buff m5 Stuart: Buff Pack Howie: Nerf Major: Minor Buff(?) m8 Scout: Major nerf Jackson: Minor Nerf WC51 Truck: Nerf Calliope: Nerf Riflemen sandbag building: Nerf Riflemen Tech: Buff Total: 7 buffs (8), 8 nerfs Osteer: BP changes: Minor Nerf(?) Pioneers: Buffed Grens: Minor buff Minor nerf Sniper Buff Pgren: Minor Nerf Ostruppen: Minor Nerf Buff Panzerwerfer: Buff Nerf S mines: Minor Nerf Panther: Major Buff Second Sniper Buff Total: 7 Buffs, 5 Nerfs (4) So not only was USF nerfed more than it buffed, Osteer was buffed more than it was nerfed. Add-on top of all the other faction nerfs and buffs(especially to OKW) I can only assume your a wehraboo, which is exactly why I decided to fact check you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback28 Nov 2020, 23:32 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2020, 11:39 AMgbem its has the anti infantry of a panzer 4 while being completely helpless against armor for a 30% fuel discount... while costing even more fuel to deploy than a panzer 4 initially due to expensive soviet teching and AT nade/molotov sidetechs Fact Check: False It's only a 25% fuel discount, 120 fuel compared to 90 fuel. 120 x 0.75 = 90 fuel. In: COH2 Balance