Profile of Highfiveeeee

If Relic was sportsman like Lebron, thay will be end his carrier in 28 after 1 NBA win, coz his body will be fail him, also drugs and alcohol.

... What?

is that solution ?

i like RNG but i hate injustice RNG you know that

Look at it this way - The Ostheer player was pretty happy with RNG that game.

the SU-76s biggest flaw imho is not the lack of the turret or the paper armor but rather the inaccuracy... its speed and range compensate for the lack of turret and the paper thing armor...

but the lack of accuracy renders its gun nearly useless at long range... and vulnerable at close range... and a properly supported SU-76 is gonna have trouble hitting the panzer 4 even with an AT nade... at which point it becomes redundant... too inaccurate to hit anything... too expensive a barrage ability... tries to be a jack of all trades... but fails badly...

I get your point, I did not know that the accuracy became worse after the patch (haven't played Sovs for a while now), but imo the pen and accuracy was extremely good before as well.

The thing is that it has to be bad in some way. It perfectly counters Light Vehicles like 222s. 251s, Flak HTs and Luchses by killing them or at least forcing them to move out of an area. The barrage then is just a nice bonus. It being free was a problem in the first place.

If you want to get a sniper tank hunter, you get the SU85 (which also has its flaws, but still).

The barrage is just extra And to be honest, I wouldn't be that bothered if they removed it entirely even without compensating buffs

I think all the "niche tanks" need this kind of "cheese" ability besides their main gun damage in order to be able to add a surprise element. StuG will make you inmaneuverable for a while. Puma does as well (?). AEC also has its thread shot. The Valentine can watch your enemy while sucking ass.

I haven't read through the whole topic but where did we start to compare the SU76 to the Jagdtiger lol?

Su76 is imo fine. Still has nice penetration, Muni cost on barrage brings consistency with the Zis and makes the SU76 much less a Jack of all Trades.

The Su76s biggest flaws are its low HP and the lack of a turret. It shares these problems with the StuG that has more HP but also the same mobility issues all TDs in the games have, while also being more expensive and lacking a barrage ability. Meanwhile the Target Weakpoint makes it better for hunting tanks.

I personally would place the SU76 as a "Light Tank Hunter" on the same level as e.g. the Luchs is a Light AI Vehicle. It is very powerful in the mid game but might go under in the late without proper vet.

A properly supported SU76 (mines / AT nades) can screw a Panzer IV which is double the cost and way more drastic to lose than a 76 could ever be. Also, the SU76 eats 3 PaK shot and dies. This is a very good case of the Rock/Paper/Scissor sheme of the game. This is balanced. Making the Su76 to be reliably able to take out PaKs without exposing itself for free(!!) is not.

the tech is technicaly cheap and is only one-time buy.
after that you can build this super cheap unit all where you want and can now hold the area easily. when i say super cheap...yeah..i mean super duber cheap compared to its performanche.

It simply is an area denial tool like MG Bunkers. You pay fuel but get a 360° arc. Right now you are trying to make the Bofors a no-brainer which counters everything but the heaviest tanks, which is not the case. A single mortar or even better leIG and the Bofors can't do shit because it cannot runaway. You need Sappers to repair it constantly (making them bleed like hell because of repairing damage penalties) unless you play fortification doctrine, which is shit.

where can i get a 30 fuel unit wich wipe squad often in 1-2 sec

It wipes fast but 1-2 seconds is an overstatement.

can barrage/ pin unit wide away

Unless you put a squad inside, it won't pin anything. Nobody uses the barrage anymore after the FRP nerf because Brit units are expensive as fuck and you won't waste 280MP only for some light barrage things that is mostly used to tear down houses.

has AA abilty,

It doesn't. It literally does NOT harm planes. This is a bug, but still.

has brace, stand longer than a schwerer building from OKW and where the enemy need min a mid game army to destroy it when you arent a noob?

Compared to what? OKW - Build 2 leIGs and the Bofors melts like butter. You don't lose any fuel while the enemy spent 30 for literally nothing and also is not able to get an AEC anymore. Ostheer: Build a mortar and a flame 251. Smoke + attack ground -> Bofors gone, 251 Vet 2.

ALSO, that 45(?) fuel for a single Bofors means a 3-4 minute longer time until a Cromwell arrives. AND you also lack the MP to build an AT Gun, which means that an incoming Panzer 4 will tear you apart.

mix it with aindirect fire unit and a AT gun or a td...any viola-.--your enemy need a endgame army or must spam arty

Indirect fire as in mortar pit which was nerfed into the ground? Also, about 900MP + 30 Fuel only to defend a small area of the map is a huge investment. That can be negated by Mortars/leIGs easily. And also the enemy has a way better army if you put all your MP into this immobile trash.