Login

russian armor

What should Bofors be replaced with?

14 Sep 2019, 00:28 AM
#1
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

UKF should get something to replace the Bofors with since their now down a unit/structure and I'm just wondering what they could do for a new stock unit/structure/ability.

1) They could get the M5 halftrack and remove it from the new commander

2) They could get an M3 halftrack

3) They could make the Valentine stock

4) The could have buildable MG bunkers like they have in their base
14 Sep 2019, 00:30 AM
#2
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

Have actually tried it?

It works right now, and still kills LV , just not medium tanks like it did before

And doesn’t insta delete inf but pin them very fast
14 Sep 2019, 00:34 AM
#3
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3

Have actually tried it?

It works right now, and still kills LV , just not medium tanks like it did before

And doesn’t insta delete inf but pin them very fast


+1
14 Sep 2019, 00:38 AM
#4
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

To put it simply, it’s a okw defence fortifications flack fun but with much more hp and some abilities
14 Sep 2019, 01:49 AM
#5
avatar of WAAAGH2000

Posts: 731

Maybe bundle UKF T2 upgrade together……after upgrade allowed build Bofors and AEC
14 Sep 2019, 03:16 AM
#6
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

Maybe bundle UKF T2 upgrade together……after upgrade allowed build Bofors and AEC


I wouldn't build a Bofors if it were free at this point so that's not really going to do anything. If they want the Bofors gone they should just replace it with something else.
14 Sep 2019, 03:17 AM
#7
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

For a bofor replacement, i will go with the valentine, rework it in to a slow AI tank, 550-600 HP, 4.8-5 speed, 80dmg main gun, improve aoe and MG, somke pot. So that, in T2, UKF have choice between fast AT and slow AI specialist.

In the other hand, post patch bofor doesn't bad, with reliable suppression, it still be a good area control station.
I prefer built it further behind the line now. For many situations, I use the bofor for to hold cut off or a coupled of control points that latter i will put cache, in early - mid game, it also act as a last ditch backup in case of my front line got overrun, it also protect the rear from infiltration units like fall or stomtrooop, all while provide some short of AA. And yeah, The only thing need improve is AA, if AA performance of bofor can be just more reliable, it will be very nice.
14 Sep 2019, 03:31 AM
#8
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

For a bofor replacement, i will go with the valentine, rework it in to a slow AI tank, 550-600 HP, 4.8-5 speed, 80dmg main gun, improve aoe and MG, somke pot. So that, in T2, UKF have choice between fast AT and slow AI specialist.

In the other hand, post patch bofor doesn't bad, with reliable suppression, it still be a good area control station.
I prefer built it further behind the line now. For many situations, I use the bofor for to hold cut off or a coupled of control points that latter i will put cache, in early - mid game, it also act as a last ditch backup in case of my front line got overrun, it also protect the rear from infiltration units like fall or stomtrooop, all while provide some short of AA. And yeah, The only thing need improve is AA, if AA performance of bofor can be just more reliable, it will be very nice.


Seems like a lot of resouses to spend on an emergency rear guard unit that's immobile and you will likely never use. With something like a USF fighting position or OST MG bunker you are paying a relatively small about of resources and zero pop and getting a much better emergency rear guard unit. I think UKF should be able to build their base MG bunkers now as a Bofors replacement.
14 Sep 2019, 03:59 AM
#9
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2019, 03:31 AMCODGUY


Seems like a lot of resouses to spend on an emergency rear guard unit that's immobile and you will likely never use. With something like a USF fighting position or OST MG bunker you are paying a relatively small about of resources and zero pop and getting a much better emergency rear guard unit. I think UKF should be able to build their base MG bunkers now as a Bofors replacement.


As i said, it is situational and it is my personal way of using the unit. I didn't say my way is the most efficiency way but i can make it work and I'm still adapting to the new patch, finding new way to make good use of what i have in the faction.

Dont misunderstand me, i'm 100% with you in replace the bofor by something else, you can take a look in my valentine idea. But, For now, I can confidently said that the bofor is still far from being deleted.

Yet i'm UKF main.
14 Sep 2019, 13:41 PM
#10
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2019, 03:16 AMCODGUY


I wouldn't build a Bofors if it were free at this point so that's not really going to do anything. If they want the Bofors gone they should just replace it with something else.

There is no reasoning with madness they say.

I dont think anyone wants bofors gone, but you just want how it was 'OP' against unaware and newer players.
Basically it was a noob roflstomper.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 13
United States 154
New Zealand 15

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

840 users are online: 840 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49131
Welcome our newest member, Mcwowell05
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM