Guards assault group
10 May 2019, 12:26 PM
#1
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Guards assault group - completely useless. it comes to 5 CP, it didn’t even become cheaper after the M5 was cheaper. I have been saying for a long time already that the Guards Assault Group needs redesign: my proposal to make them as Rangers anolog: come with Guard Mosin / SVT-40 can buy 4 Thompson and 2 Bazooka.
10 May 2019, 12:30 PM
#2
Posts: 206
The thompsons and bazookas would really fit the theme of Lend lease. Also a 0.50 instead of the dshk
10 May 2019, 12:36 PM
#3
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Do what relic and all others did - just forget that unit and commander ever existed.
10 May 2019, 13:05 PM
#4
Posts: 732
Agree,but I want they default weapon be Shock Troopers PPsh,and it only for Lend,Bazooka and M1919 (same as USF airborne)will better?
10 May 2019, 13:23 PM
#5
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Was hoping that they would count the Airborne Guards as Assault Guards so that the Assault Group Guards could sneak into scope but alas it wasn't meant to be. Sucks because with the recent changes to DSHK and M4C Lend Lease has the chance to be relevant.
10 May 2019, 13:27 PM
#6
Posts: 3260
It's beyond unlikely we'll see any redesign at this point in the patch. Price cuts are possible though.
Stick it at 450 MP: then you're paying 240 MP for the halftrack and 210 for the Lend Lease Guards. That makes it a highly cost efficient midgame bundle like Recon's Airdrop Group, but the bundled halftrack and late timing makes it highly inefficient to spam.
Stick it at 450 MP: then you're paying 240 MP for the halftrack and 210 for the Lend Lease Guards. That makes it a highly cost efficient midgame bundle like Recon's Airdrop Group, but the bundled halftrack and late timing makes it highly inefficient to spam.
10 May 2019, 13:28 PM
#7
Posts: 366
Just tried them out, I like them but seem to die too fast. And yes, sucks they didnt get any changes.
Prioritize vehicle dosnt work on the Sherman.
Prioritize vehicle dosnt work on the Sherman.
10 May 2019, 15:23 PM
#8
Posts: 1484
Yea I agree - Thompson would be really cool but was this historically correct?
10 May 2019, 16:26 PM
#9
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Yea I agree - Thompson would be really cool but was this historically correct?
Kind of, Red Army got afaik 100 000 SMGs by lend-lease, but they didn't get widespead usage becuase of limited 0.45 ammunition. The bigest part of them was M1928 Thompsons, it seems little bit different from M1 Thompson, but mainly the same thing.
IMO, if assault guards was just call-in unit unit with exclusive upgrades (you can give them 4 Thompsons OR 2 Bazookas) and started with Mosins Rifles or SVT-40, it will be much more interesting choice.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
30 | |||||
28 | |||||
14 | |||||
9 | |||||
2 | |||||
164 | |||||
7 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.640231.735-1
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.921406.694-1
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1237
Board Info
270 users are online:
270 guests
1 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49211
Welcome our newest member, hello88finance
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, hello88finance
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM