thats still quite the difference in durability before (and after) skirts. also important, hand AT. shreks deal 120 damage, so the hard HP of the m20 could have it dead by 2 hit, but the 222 needs 3 zook hits.
ill admit i didnt realize the m20 stock armour was that high, but i stand by my point, the 222 is more durable. unless you add a boat load of munitions to the m20 that is.
I have simply pointed out that compared to underskirt M20 the 222 is only slightly more durable vs penetration 1 weapons and that against some at weapons the HP difference does not really mater contrary to the claim that is more durable against ALL AT weapons.
I have also pointed that the skirted M20 is far more durable than 222 vs small arms while it has the same HP.
The original claim that 222 is significantly more durable is simply flawed, as I pointed out.