Login

russian armor

Please give the MG42 back some bite and other musings

2 Oct 2013, 16:57 PM
#61
avatar of rofltehcat

Posts: 604

If I remember correctly, suppression is just suppression*bullets fired (bullets fired = rate of fire * burst length). Doesn't matter if they hit, so accuracy doesn't do anything for it. However, there are additional suppression modifiers in the cover tables, 0.5 for light and 0.1 for heavy cover.
3 Oct 2013, 05:14 AM
#62
avatar of Eupolemos
Donator 33

Posts: 368



- Where art thou?

Anyway, thank you Apple and VonI, for the sober replies :)
3 Oct 2013, 15:26 PM
#63
avatar of Lichtbringer

Posts: 476

If I remember correctly, suppression is just suppression*bullets fired (bullets fired = rate of fire * burst length). Doesn't matter if they hit, so accuracy doesn't do anything for it. However, there are additional suppression modifiers in the cover tables, 0.5 for light and 0.1 for heavy cover.


But if thats the case, why are there so diffrent outcomes in the time the mg needs to surpress? Only because of occasional yellow cover? Hmm.
3 Oct 2013, 16:30 PM
#64
avatar of rofltehcat

Posts: 604



But if thats the case, why are there so diffrent outcomes in the time the mg needs to surpress? Only because of occasional yellow cover? Hmm.


I did a quick search but it seems they took down the last mirror of the old CoH1 stats site. The site had a pretty good writeup of how the cover system worked in CoH1 and I can only assume it behaves roughly the same (though infantry in CoH2 don't seem to show the variance in treshold and recovery speed as CoH1 infantry so there may very well be differences). The writeup on the companyofheroes wikia doesn't seem to be as in-depth :/

The variances in the amount of suppression done might be a result of cover as well as squad spacing (e.g. nearby suppression values/modifiers though I think those only affected nearby squads in CoH1). Cover seems to be pretty spotty in CoH2 with light cover nearly everywhere from small bushes and a little grass to small craters. Maybe it is already enough if one infantryman has light cover for the suppression calculation? We know that a single guy in light cover can show the yellow shield icon but the rest of the squad can still die because they are in negative cover. Maybe we're seeing the inverse of this effect for suppression? Just a lot of speculation, of course.
3 Oct 2013, 18:21 PM
#65
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2



Since I see my units get supressed in light cover too, I'm not convinced that this is a problem.

However, if it is in fact that, I suppose it could somehow be fixed by decreasing the value of cover if the unit is moving?


Had several matches than even if i had forward vision with an MG, shocktroops would just run forward n throw nades due to light cover craters : /
3 Oct 2013, 21:11 PM
#66
avatar of SgtBulldog

Posts: 688

Shocktroops? Yes ofc. They cost 440 mp. They are allowed not to nosedive at the very first MG-bullet.

The issue here was some ppl who said conscripts run through unhindered. Which happens to be untrue in 98% of cases.
3 Oct 2013, 21:29 PM
#67
avatar of JohanSchwarz

Posts: 409

Shocktroops? Yes ofc. They cost 440 mp. They are allowed not to nosedive at the very first MG-bullet.

The issue here was some ppl who said conscripts run through unhindered. Which happens to be untrue in 98% of cases.


Suppression happens at the same rate regardless of armour so if Shock Troops can walk through MG fire unhindered then conscripts can do the same.

The only difference between the two in this case is that the conscript squad will be dying as it is walking up which doesn't really matter since as long as the molotov is thrown the engagement is essentially won in 90% of cases.
4 Oct 2013, 18:04 PM
#68
avatar of herr anfsim

Posts: 247

Shocktroops? Yes ofc. They cost 440 mp. They are allowed not to nosedive at the very first MG-bullet.

The issue here was some ppl who said conscripts run through unhindered. Which happens to be untrue in 98% of cases.


I strongly disagree with this. No troops should be allowed to charge through machinegunfire. Supressing is the only thin i does well, if troops can charge head on it looses its usefulnes and the game basicly turns in to hordes of infantry roaming the map.

The removal of "supersprint" was one of the few good changes mad from vCOH.
4 Oct 2013, 21:03 PM
#69
avatar of Turtle

Posts: 401

True, however, the super sprint was one of the things that helped balance out the MGs of those games from dominating.
5 Oct 2013, 09:05 AM
#70
avatar of SgtBulldog

Posts: 688



I strongly disagree with this. No troops should be allowed to charge through machinegunfire. Supressing is the only thin i does well, if troops can charge head on it looses its usefulnes and the game basicly turns in to hordes of infantry roaming the map.

The removal of "supersprint" was one of the few good changes mad from vCOH.


Demanding that some unit can achieve something 100% of the time is a mindset best suited for chess and similar games.

This is war.

Shit happens and random stuff will play in. That's how it should be and I like it.

And again: It's about 2% of the times that an infantry unit can walk unhindered through MG fire.
5 Oct 2013, 09:53 AM
#71
avatar of Turtle

Posts: 401

Again, the biggest problem isn't that they're getting through MG fire from the front. The problem is basically they're running up, getting suppressed within grenade of molotov range, and throwing before being pinned.

That may be somewhat intentional.
5 Oct 2013, 10:29 AM
#72
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
Nothing entering into the arc of either HMG should be able to do anything except eat dirt.
5 Oct 2013, 10:29 AM
#73
avatar of BabaRoga

Posts: 829

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Oct 2013, 09:53 AMTurtle
Again, the biggest problem isn't that they're getting through MG fire from the front. The problem is basically they're running up, getting suppressed within grenade of molotov range, and throwing before being pinned.

That may be somewhat intentional.


I think that number of times the unit can get through MG42 fire and land Molotov on it, about equals number of times molotov doesn't do shit to MG42.

If RNG God likes you in one game, you forget it fast and attribute success entirely to yourself. If the RNG God has a pick on you, than its just ridiculously hard to play and everyone remembers that bit, frustrating.....

I think we all do it
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Willy Pete: And only on annihilation, and I have to let the AI live long enough...
Today, 02:04 AM
Willy Pete: Pershing is absurd, but ive still only gotten to use it against AI
Today, 02:03 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Pershing for Axis, that is all :lolol:
Yesterday, 13:32 PM
donofsandiego: :clap:
Yesterday, 02:34 AM
donofsandiego: Return of the chatGPT writing prompt. Lets see how shinasukac responds to these questions utilizing the Socratic Method. Maybe he will give us an interesting look into his opinions
Yesterday, 02:34 AM
Willy Pete: I havent even seen a pershing yet. Coh3 games still move too fast for it lol
Yesterday, 00:30 AM
shinasukac: kingtiger=kingjoker
Last Wednesday, 16:27 PM
Lady Xenarra: Has anyone actually used the KT much? My experience is that the match is usually over long before I get the CPs for it
Last Wednesday, 14:35 PM
Rosbone: Can someone message me the day you can look at Coh3 and not face palm yourself in disbelief that actual humans worked on it? Much appreciated.
Last Wednesday, 06:40 AM
Rosbone: The only way to feel good about Coh3 is to never look at Coh3. Once you see it, you cant unsee it.
Last Wednesday, 06:37 AM
Rosbone: Observer mode sucks, player stats pages are scatter brained mess, etc etc etc
Last Wednesday, 06:35 AM
Rosbone: It is really hard to tell people to buy the DLC with feeling like they are throwing their money down the toilet for a nearly dead game. But Big Tonks!!! Oh well, not my problem.
Last Tuesday, 18:12 PM
Rosbone: No 4v4 maps, busted menus 2 years after release, still have not fixed janky sounds people have complained about for over 2 years, etc etc.
Last Tuesday, 18:10 PM
Rosbone: And the skirmish menus are still at a BETA level. Just the largest game play mode completely ignored... again.
Last Tuesday, 18:09 PM
Willy Pete: Oh wtf. Yeah the crossing remake was in the 2v2 demo. No more 3s and 4s is a bummer tho
Last Tuesday, 16:42 PM
aerafield: What? No, he means that all the new maps are for 1v1. Though Im pretty sure they will be playable in 2v2 as well
Last Tuesday, 15:50 PM
Willy Pete: Are the maps really locked behind dlc? Surely they must be in the regular update
Last Tuesday, 15:22 PM
Rosbone: I would like to join in celebration with the 9% of Coh3 MP players who are getting ALL of the new maps. Woohoo! #3Tards
21 Feb 2025, 19:22 PM
OKSpitfire: I hope that at least one of heavies is a like-for-like reskin of the coh 2 ISU-152. I miss that thing.
21 Feb 2025, 10:23 AM
Rosbone: Buy our cool new large tanks that will never get played on the 4 new 1v1 maps added. Perfect synergy! :facepalm:
20 Feb 2025, 19:23 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

277 users are online: 277 guests
10 posts in the last 24h
20 posts in the last week
55 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52093
Welcome our newest member, westhousefb777
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM